Usage Score
24.9
Player Dossier
2009-2012Air Force
WR • 5'9" • Cedar Park, TX, USA
Drew Coleman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.9
Efficiency
81.5
Consistency
28
Season Value
56.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Air Force
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Coleman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Air Force. Drew Coleman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Drew Coleman played WR for Air Force. Across 4 tracked seasons, Drew Coleman recorded 159 rushing yards, 467 receiving yards, and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Air Force.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Air Force paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
34.1
Efficiency
81.5
Usage
24.9
Consistency
28
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 15. Unknown: 42. Michigan: 6. UNLV: 0. Colorado State: 53. Navy: 106. Wyoming: 8. Army: 90. San Diego State: 6. Fresno State: 15
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 1 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 40. Colorado State: 1 by 100. Navy: 4 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 53.3. Army: 4 by 100. San Diego State: 1 by 40. Fresno State: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Rice | L 14-33 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Fresno State | L 15-48 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ San Diego State | L 9-28 | — | 1 | 6 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Army | L 21-41 | — | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Wyoming | W 28-27 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Navy100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 21-28 | — | 4 | 106 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 2 | 54 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Colorado State | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 53 | 26.5 | 53 | 1 | 53 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ UNLV | L 35-38 | — | — | — | 9 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Michigan | L 25-31 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 42 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Air Force
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 7 | 46.7 | 14.3 | 7 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 119 | 80 | 11.3 | 112 |
| 2012 Postseason | Air Force | 341 | 81.5 | 24.9 | 222 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Air Force | 341 | 81.5 | 24.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
90
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Colorado State
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
TCU
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Air Force
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2012 Postseason · Air Force
56.4
341 primary · 81.5 efficiency · 24.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Air Force
56.4
341 primary · 81.5 efficiency · 24.9 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.7444
Vista Ridge · Leander, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
467
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.