Usage / Role
63%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2009-2012Air Force
RB • 5'9" • Houston, TX, USA
Wes Cobb leans balanced backfield option traits and 38.2 efficiency.
Usage / Role
63%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
55
Solid production for a back
Reliability
70
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
44
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Air Force
Snapshot
Player Story
Wes Cobb built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a running back from Houston, TX wearing No. 35, spending time with Air Force. The clearest part of Wes Cobb's career was his backfield work: 977 rushing...
Read the storyWes Cobb, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · Air Force. Wes Cobb leans balanced backfield option traits and 38.2 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 1 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 36.2 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 3 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 25.8 |
| 2011 Postseason | Air Force | 13 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 13 | 380 | 380 | 0 | 4 | 52.5 |
| 2012 Postseason | Air Force | 13 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 1 | 57.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Air Force | 13 | 497 | 491 | 6 | 8 | 57.3 |
Related Context
Wes Cobb played RB for Air Force. Across 4 tracked seasons, Wes Cobb recorded 977 rushing yards, 6 receiving yards, and 13 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Air Force.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Air Force paired 536 primary output with 38.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 38.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
41.2
Efficiency
38.2
Usage
15.4
Consistency
46.7
Best Game by takeover score
Nevada
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 39. Idaho State: 16. Michigan: 29. UNLV: 8. Colorado State: 3. Navy: 16. Wyoming: 49. New Mexico: 82. Nevada: 152. Army: 7. San Diego State: 48. Hawai'i: 54. Fresno State: 33
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 13 by 31.3. Idaho State: 3 by 55.6. Michigan: 6 by 48.9. UNLV: 4 by 20.8. Colorado State: 1 by 31.3. Navy: 6 by 27.8. Wyoming: 13 by 39.3. New Mexico: 17 by 50.2. Nevada: 30 by 52.8. Army: 4 by 18.2. San Diego State: 14 by 35.7. Hawai'i: 12 by 46.9. Fresno State: 9 by 38.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nevada
Best efficiency game
55.6 vs Idaho State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Rice | L 14-33 | 13 | 39 | 3 | 1 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Fresno State | L 15-48 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Hawai'i2+ TD | W 21-7 | 12 | 54 | 4.50 | 2 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ San Diego State | L 9-28 | 14 | 48 | 3.40 | 1 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Army | L 21-41 | 4 | 7 | 1.80 | 1 | — | — | 1.8 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Nevada100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 48-31 | 30 | 152 | 5.10 | 1 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs New Mexico2+ TD | W 28-23 | 17 | 82 | 4.80 | 3 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Wyoming | W 28-27 | 13 | 49 | 3.80 | 0 | — | — | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Navy | L 21-28 | 6 | 16 | 2.70 | 0 | — | — | 2.7 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Colorado State | W 42-21 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ UNLV | L 35-38 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Michigan | L 25-31 | 5 | 23 | 4.60 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Idaho State | W 49-21 | 3 | 16 | 5.30 | 0 | — | — | 5.3 |
Player Story
Wes Cobb built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a running back from Houston, TX wearing No. 35, spending time with Air Force. The clearest part of Wes Cobb's career was his backfield work: 977 rushing yards, 239 carries, 13 rushing touchdowns, and 6 receiving yards across 30 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with Air Force. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 6 receiving yards and 12 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 30 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Air Force.
The arc is straightforward: Wes Cobb moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Air Force
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 9 | 31.3 | 4.1 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 13 | 32.6 | 3.6 | 4 |
| 2011 Postseason | Air Force | 425 | 41.1 | 12.2 | 412 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 425 | 41.1 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Air Force | 536 | 38.2 | 15.4 | 111 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Air Force | 536 | 38.2 | 15.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Nevada
Week 9 · W 48-31 · Conference game
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
152
Scrimmage Yards
84.3 takeover
152 scrimmage yards and 36.1 usage.
#2
@ Colorado State
Week 13 · W 45-21 · Conference game
83
Scrimmage Yards
78.5 takeover
Win with 83 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
83 scrimmage yards and 22.2 usage.
#3
vs Wyoming
Week 11 · L 17-25 · Conference game
64
Scrimmage Yards
66.1 takeover
Loss with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 9.4 usage.
#4
vs New Mexico
Week 8 · W 28-23 · Conference game
82
Scrimmage Yards
65.3 takeover
Win with 82 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
82 scrimmage yards and 32.1 usage.
#5
vs South Dakota
Week 1 · W 37-20
60
Scrimmage Yards
60.3 takeover
Win with 60 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
60 scrimmage yards and 23.4 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · Air Force
536 primary output · 38.2 efficiency · 15.4 usage
57.3
#2
2012 Regular Season · Air Force
57.3
536 primary · 38.2 efficiency · 15.4 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Air Force
52.5
425 primary · 41.1 efficiency · 12.2 usage
1
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.