Usage Score
13.6
Player Dossier
2009-2011Air Force
Mikel Hunter
WR • 5'9" • Conyers, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mikel Hunter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.1
Consistency
54.4
Season Value
62.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Air Force
090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Air Force
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mikel Hunter, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Air Force. Mikel Hunter reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Mikel Hunter played WR for Air Force. Across 3 tracked seasons, Mikel Hunter recorded 380 rushing yards, 350 receiving yards, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Air Force.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Air Force paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Dakota
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Air Force
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
20.3
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
13.6
Consistency
54.4
Best Game by takeover score
South Dakota
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 18. South Dakota: 55. TCU: 18. Tennessee State: 46. Navy: 37. Notre Dame: 6. San Diego State: 23. Boise State: 5. New Mexico: 0. Wyoming: 0. UNLV: 13. Colorado State: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 1 by 100. South Dakota: 1 by 100. TCU: 1 by 100. Tennessee State: 2 by 100. Navy: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 40. San Diego State: 3 by 51.1. Boise State: 1 by 33.3. UNLV: 1 by 86.7. Colorado State: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins29 · Games = 6 · +17.3 vs Losses
Losses11.7 · Games = 6 · -17.3 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Dakota
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | vs Toledo | L 41-42 | — | 1 | 18 | 8 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Colorado State | W 45-21 | — | 1 | 23 | 20 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UNLV | W 45-17 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Wyoming | L 17-25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ New Mexico | W 42-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Boise State | L 26-37 | — | 1 | 5 | -1 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Fri 10/14 | vs San Diego State | L 27-41 | — | 3 | 23 | 12.1 | 7.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 33-59 | — | 1 | 6 | 1.5 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Navy | W 35-34 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Tennessee State | W 63-24 | — | 2 | 46 | 16.7 | 23 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs TCU | L 19-35 | — | 1 | 18 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs South Dakota | W 37-20 | — | 1 | 55 | 45.7 | 55 | 1 | 55 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Air Force | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Air Force | 106 | 71.7 | 23.2 | 106 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 106 | 71.7 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Air Force | 244 | 81.1 | 13.6 | 138 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 244 | 81.1 | 13.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56
Primary metric
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Dakota
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tennessee State
46
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
BYU
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Air Force
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2009 Regular Season · Air Force
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Air Force
62.3
244 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 13.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
350
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Mikel Hunter
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.