Usage Score
40.4
Player Dossier
2022-2024Army
WR • 6'2" • 192 lbs • Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA
Casey Reynolds reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
40.4
Efficiency
93.3
Consistency
41.6
Season Value
68.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Casey Reynolds, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · Army. Casey Reynolds reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Casey Reynolds played WR for Army. Across 3 tracked seasons, Casey Reynolds recorded 686 receiving yards, 5 tackles, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Army.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Army paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 93.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
34.5
Efficiency
93.3
Usage
40.4
Consistency
41.6
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 13. Lehigh: 22. Florida Atlantic: 44. Rice: 31. Temple: 27. UAB: 84. East Carolina: 85. Air Force: 24. North Texas: 0. Notre Dame: 11. UTSA: 81. Tulane: 9. Navy: 18
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 1 by 86.7. Lehigh: 1 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100. Rice: 2 by 100. Temple: 1 by 100. UAB: 2 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 100. Air Force: 1 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 73.3. UTSA: 4 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 60. Navy: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 27-6 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 12/14 | vs Navy | L 13-31 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Tulane | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs UTSA | W 29-24 | — | 4 | 81 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-49 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ North Texas | W 14-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Air Force | W 20-3 | — | 1 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs East Carolina | W 45-28 | — | 3 | 85 | 28.3 | 28.30 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs UAB | W 44-10 | — | 2 | 84 | 42 | 42 | 1 | 50 |
| Thu 9/26 | @ Temple | W 42-14 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Rice | W 37-14 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 24-7 | — | 1 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 44 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Lehigh | W 42-7 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2022-2024
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Army | 237 | 75.1 | 29.1 | 237 |
| 2024 Postseason | Army | 449 | 93.3 | 40.4 | 212 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Army | 449 | 93.3 | 40.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84
Primary metric
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
East Carolina
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Holy Cross
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2022 Regular Season · Army
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Postseason · Army
68.8
449 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 40.4 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Army
68.8
449 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 40.4 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
686
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.