Usage Score
23.1
Player Dossier
2024-2025UTEP
WR • 5'10" • 195 lbs • Loganville, GA, USA
Jaden Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
23.1
Efficiency
59.9
Consistency
85.3
Season Value
67.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2024 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaden Smith, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2024 Regular Season · UTEP. Jaden Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jaden Smith played WR for UTEP. Across 2 tracked seasons, Jaden Smith recorded 4 passing yards, -1 rushing yards, and 177 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2024 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
UTEP paired 177 primary output with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 59.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Utah
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
44.3
Efficiency
59.9
Usage
23.1
Consistency
85.3
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Utah
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 33. Southern Utah: 56. Liberty: 42. Colorado State: 46
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 4 by 55. Southern Utah: 4 by 93.3. Liberty: 7 by 40. Colorado State: 6 by 51.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Utah
Best efficiency game
93.3 vs Southern Utah
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | UTEP | 177 | 59.9 | 23.1 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | -177 |
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
81
Primary metric
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
102
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 97.1 efficiency score.
#3
Louisville
43
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 57.3 efficiency score.
#4
Southern Utah
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
48
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 64 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2024 Regular Season · UTEP
177 primary output · 59.9 efficiency · 23.1 usage
67.1
#2
2025 Regular Season · UTEP
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
177
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.