Usage Score
24.3
Player Dossier
2024-2025Kennesaw State
WR • 5'10" • 185 lbs • Ocilla, GA, USA
Gabriel Benyard reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.3
Efficiency
81.5
Consistency
63.6
Season Value
67.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Kennesaw State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gabriel Benyard, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Kennesaw State. Gabriel Benyard reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Gabriel Benyard played WR for Kennesaw State. Across 2 tracked seasons, Gabriel Benyard recorded 161 rushing yards, 1,111 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Kennesaw State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Kennesaw State paired 949 primary output with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
67.8
Efficiency
81.5
Usage
24.3
Consistency
63.6
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 51. Wake Forest: 103. Indiana: 51. Merrimack: 54. Arkansas State: 114. Middle Tennessee: 41. Louisiana Tech: 35. Florida International: 97. UTEP: -1. New Mexico State: 74. Jacksonville State: 100. Missouri State: 127. Liberty: 82. Jacksonville State: 21
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 5 by 68. Wake Forest: 5 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 100. Merrimack: 5 by 72. Arkansas State: 6 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 68.3. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 33.3. Florida International: 5 by 100. UTEP: 1 by 0. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. Jacksonville State: 5 by 100. Missouri State: 7 by 100. Liberty: 4 by 100. Jacksonville State: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Missouri State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Jacksonville State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/19 | @ Western Michigan | L 6-41 | — | 5 | 51 | 8.8 | 10.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Jacksonville State | W 19-15 | — | 1 | 21 | 10.5 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Liberty2+ TD | W 48-42 | — | 4 | 82 | 16 | 20.50 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Missouri State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-34 | — | 7 | 127 | 15.1 | 18.10 | 2 | 41 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Jacksonville State100 receiving yards | L 26-35 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ New Mexico State2+ TD | W 24-21 | — | 3 | 74 | 20.8 | 24.70 | 2 | 34 |
| Wed 10/29 | vs UTEP | W 33-20 | — | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Tue 10/21 | @ Florida International | W 45-26 | — | 5 | 97 | 19.4 | 19.40 | 0 | 52 |
| Thu 10/9 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 35-7 | — | 7 | 35 | 6.7 | 5 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 24-16 | — | 4 | 41 | 8 | 10.30 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Arkansas State100 receiving yards | W 28-21 | — | 6 | 114 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Merrimack | W 27-13 | — | 5 | 54 | 11.5 | 10.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Indiana | L 9-56 | — | 2 | 51 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Wake Forest100 receiving yards | L 9-10 | — | 5 | 103 | 18.7 | 20.60 | 0 | 47 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Kennesaw State
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Kennesaw State | 162 | 55.3 | 23.6 | — |
| 2025 Postseason | Kennesaw State | 949 | 81.5 | 24.3 | 787 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Kennesaw State | 949 | 81.5 | 24.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Missouri State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127
Primary metric
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wake Forest
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida International
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas State
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 65 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Kennesaw State
949 primary output · 81.5 efficiency · 24.3 usage
67.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Kennesaw State
67.4
949 primary · 81.5 efficiency · 24.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Kennesaw State
40.1
162 primary · 55.3 efficiency · 23.6 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,111
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 22 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.