Usage Score
16.5
Player Dossier
2009-2011Arizona
Gino Crump
WR • 6'2" • Washington, DC, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Gino Crump reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
53.9
Consistency
66.2
Season Value
59.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Arizona
091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Arizona
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gino Crump, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Arizona. Gino Crump reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Gino Crump played WR for Arizona. Across 3 tracked seasons, Gino Crump recorded 649 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Arizona.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Arizona paired 610 primary output with 53.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 53.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Arizona
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
50.8
Efficiency
53.9
Usage
16.5
Consistency
66.2
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northern Arizona: 43. Oklahoma State: 19. Stanford: 44. Oregon: 45. USC: 42. Oregon State: 91. UCLA: 103. Washington: 55. Utah: 0. Colorado: 95. Arizona State: 69. Louisiana: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Arizona: 5 by 57.3. Oklahoma State: 3 by 42.2. Stanford: 5 by 58.7. Oregon: 5 by 60. USC: 5 by 56. Oregon State: 7 by 86.7. UCLA: 9 by 76.3. Washington: 6 by 61.1. Utah: 1 by 0. Colorado: 10 by 63.3. Arizona State: 6 by 76.7. Louisiana: 3 by 8.9
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins54.8 · Games = 4 · +5.9 vs Losses
Losses48.9 · Games = 8 · -5.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs Louisiana | W 45-37 | — | 3 | 4 | 1.3 | 1.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Arizona State | W 31-27 | — | 6 | 69 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ ColoradoHigh volume | L 29-48 | — | 10 | 95 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Utah | L 21-34 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 10/30 | @ Washington | L 31-42 | — | 6 | 55 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 13 |
| Fri 10/21 | vs UCLA100 receiving yards · High volume | W 48-12 | — | 9 | 103 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Oregon State | L 27-37 | — | 7 | 91 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ USC | L 41-48 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Oregon | L 31-56 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Stanford | L 10-37 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Fri 9/9 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-37 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Northern Arizona | W 41-10 | — | 5 | 43 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 1 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Arizona | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Arizona | 39 | 65 | 6.7 | 39 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Arizona | 610 | 53.9 | 16.5 | 571 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 76.3 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon State
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado
95
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
#4
Toledo
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
The Citadel
19
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
19 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Arizona
610 primary output · 53.9 efficiency · 16.5 usage
59.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Arizona
44.3
39 primary · 65 efficiency · 6.7 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Arizona
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
649
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Gino Crump
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.