Usage Score
30.5
Player Dossier
2009-2011Bowling Green
Kamar Jorden
WR • 6'3" • Darby, PA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kamar Jorden reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.7
Consistency
70.9
Season Value
70
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
091011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kamar Jorden, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Kamar Jorden reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 1,109 primary output with 72.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
90.8
Efficiency
80.7
Usage
30.5
Consistency
70.9
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 23. Unknown: 51. Wyoming: 101. Miami (OH): 91. West Virginia: 46. Western Michigan: 103. Toledo: 106. Temple: 52. Kent State: 203. Northern Illinois: 152. Ohio: 87. Buffalo: 74
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Idaho: 4 by 38.3. Unknown: 4 by 85. Wyoming: 9 by 74.8. Miami (OH): 9 by 67.4. West Virginia: 5 by 61.3. Western Michigan: 4 by 100. Toledo: 7 by 100. Temple: 5 by 69.3. Kent State: 12 by 100. Northern Illinois: 8 by 100. Ohio: 8 by 72.5. Buffalo: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins60 · n=4 · -54 vs Losses
Losses114 · n=7 · +54 vs Wins
First Half69.2 · n=6 · -43.2 vs Second Half
Second Half112.3 · n=6 · +43.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Buffalo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Buffalo2+ TD | W 42-28 | — | 3 | 74 | 24.7 | 24.70 | 2 | 64 |
| Thu 11/17 | vs OhioHigh volume | L 28-29 | — | 8 | 87 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 1 | 22 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Northern Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-45 | — | 8 | 152 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 83 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Kent State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 15-27 | — | 12 | 203 | 16.9 | 16.90 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Temple | W 13-10 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards | L 21-28 | — | 7 | 106 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards | L 21-45 | — | 4 | 103 | 25.8 | 25.80 | 1 | 57 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ West Virginia | L 10-55 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Miami (OH)High volume | W 37-23 | — | 9 | 91 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Wyoming100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-28 | — | 9 | 101 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Idaho | W 32-15 | — | 4 | 23 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1,109 | 72.6 | 34.8 | 1,109 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1,089 | 80.7 | 30.5 | -20 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
203
Primary metric
203 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
168
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
168 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio
129
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northern Illinois
152
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
1,109 primary output · 72.6 efficiency · 34.8 usage
70.1
#2
2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
70
1,089 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 30.5 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Bowling Green
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
13
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
2,198
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.