Usage Score
19.2
Player Dossier
2023-2025Texas A&M
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • El Campo, TX, USA
Rueben Owens leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
19.2
Efficiency
57.5
Consistency
57.2
Season Value
58.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rueben Owens, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Rueben Owens leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.5 efficiency.
Rueben Owens played RB for Texas A&M. Across 3 tracked seasons, Rueben Owens recorded 1,090 rushing yards, 245 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 769 primary output with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
64.1
Efficiency
57.5
Usage
19.2
Consistency
57.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 28. UTSA: 38. Utah State: 51. Notre Dame: 29. Auburn: 52. Mississippi State: 161. Florida: 51. Arkansas: 96. LSU: 44. Missouri: 112. South Carolina: 52. Texas: 55
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 8 by 33.3. UTSA: 6 by 72.6. Utah State: 8 by 62.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 40.6. Auburn: 3 by 100. Mississippi State: 22 by 72.8. Florida: 17 by 31.3. Arkansas: 16 by 55.8. LSU: 8 by 57.3. Missouri: 15 by 80.1. South Carolina: 9 by 45.9. Texas: 16 by 37.4
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 7 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3.5 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | 13 | 48 | 3.70 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 3.4 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | 8 | 28 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 5.8 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 38-17 | 13 | 102 | 7.80 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | 8 | 44 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas2+ TD | W 45-42 | 14 | 69 | 4.90 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 6 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 17 | 51 | 3 | 1 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-9 | 21 | 142 | 6.80 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | 3 | 52 | 17.30 | 0 | — | — | 17.3 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | 7 | 40 | 5.70 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6.4 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 5 | 37 | 7.40 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Texas A&M | 494 | 38.9 | 15.4 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 494 | 38.9 | 15.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 72 | 40.1 | 15.5 | -422 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 72 | 40.1 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 769 | 57.5 | 19.2 | 697 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 769 | 57.5 | 19.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
161
Primary metric
161 scrimmage yards and 34.4 usage.
#2
Unknown
124
Primary metric
Game with 124 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
124 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#3
Missouri
112
Primary metric
Win with 112 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
112 scrimmage yards and 25.4 usage.
#4
USC
62
Primary metric
Loss with 62 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
62 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#5
Arkansas
96
Primary metric
Win with 96 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
96 scrimmage yards and 27.6 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
769 primary output · 57.5 efficiency · 19.2 usage
58.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
58.5
769 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 19.2 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Texas A&M
44
494 primary · 38.9 efficiency · 15.4 usage
3
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9853
El Campo · El Campo, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,335
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.