Usage Score
20.8
Player Dossier
2022-2025New Mexico State
Tyler King
WR • 5'9" • 180 lbs • Houston, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tyler King reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.5
Consistency
52.8
Season Value
63
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State
22232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas Tech • Wyoming • New Mexico State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler King, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State. Tyler King reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Tyler King played WR for Texas Tech, Wyoming, and New Mexico State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Tyler King recorded 122 rushing yards, 824 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with New Mexico State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
New Mexico State paired 588 primary output with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas Tech, Wyoming, New Mexico State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
73.5
Efficiency
78.5
Usage
20.8
Consistency
52.8
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Sam Houston: 132. Liberty: 68. Missouri State: 22. Western Kentucky: 13. Kennesaw State: 49. Tennessee: 77. UTEP: 49. Middle Tennessee: 178
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Sam Houston: 6 by 100. Liberty: 5 by 90.7. Missouri State: 2 by 73.3. Western Kentucky: 2 by 43.3. Kennesaw State: 4 by 81.7. Tennessee: 7 by 73.3. UTEP: 5 by 65.3. Middle Tennessee: 10 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins90.5 · Games = 2 · +22.7 vs Losses
Losses67.8 · Games = 6 · -22.7 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Middle Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-31 | — | 10 | 178 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 2 | 64 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ UTEP | W 34-31 | — | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Tennessee | L 9-42 | — | 7 | 77 | 9.3 | 11 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Kennesaw State | L 21-24 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Western Kentucky | L 16-35 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 10/23 | vs Missouri State | L 17-24 | — | 2 | 22 | 11.7 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Tue 10/14 | @ Liberty | L 27-30 | — | 5 | 68 | 9.8 | 13.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Fri 10/3 | vs Sam Houston100 receiving yards | W 37-10 | — | 6 | 132 | 14.4 | 22 | 0 | 54 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Wyoming
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
New Mexico State
2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
2022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Wyoming | 236 | 82.8 | 14.4 | 236 |
| 2025 Regular Season | New Mexico State | 588 | 78.5 | 20.8 | 352 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
178
Primary metric
178 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
BYU
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah State
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#4
Sam Houston
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
San José State
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · New Mexico State
588 primary output · 78.5 efficiency · 20.8 usage
63
#2
2023 Regular Season · Texas Tech
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Wyoming
46.5
236 primary · 82.8 efficiency · 14.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
824
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Tyler King
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.