Usage Score
26.7
Player Dossier
2022-2025UCLA
WR • 6'3" • 210 lbs • San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA
Braden Pegan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
26.7
Efficiency
85.5
Consistency
73.6
Season Value
71
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Utah State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Braden Pegan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Utah State. Braden Pegan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Utah State paired 925 primary output with 85.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UCLA, Utah State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
77.1
Efficiency
85.5
Usage
26.7
Consistency
73.6
Best Game by takeover score
Boise State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 38. Texas A&M: 23. Air Force: 147. Unknown: 95. Vanderbilt: 66. Hawai'i: 84. San José State: 93. New Mexico: 108. Nevada: 56. UNLV: 109. Fresno State: 79. Boise State: 27
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 5 by 50.7. Texas A&M: 2 by 76.7. Air Force: 7 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 100. Vanderbilt: 7 by 62.9. Hawai'i: 3 by 100. San José State: 7 by 88.6. New Mexico: 5 by 100. Nevada: 3 by 100. UNLV: 8 by 90.8. Fresno State: 8 by 65.8. Boise State: 2 by 90
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Nevada
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Boise State | L 24-25 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Fresno StateHigh volume | W 28-17 | — | 8 | 79 | 8.8 | 9.90 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ UNLV100 receiving yards · High volume | L 26-29 | — | 8 | 109 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Nevada | W 51-14 | — | 3 | 56 | 16.8 | 18.70 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards | L 14-33 | — | 5 | 108 | 21.6 | 21.60 | 1 | 54 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs San José State | W 30-25 | — | 7 | 93 | 10.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 37 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Hawai'i | L 26-44 | — | 3 | 84 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 53 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Vanderbilt | L 35-55 | — | 7 | 66 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 1 | 19 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 95 | 31.7 | 31.70 | 0 | 50 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Air Force100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 49-30 | — | 7 | 147 | 21 | 21 | 2 | 54 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Texas A&M | L 22-44 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTEP | W 28-16 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2022-2024
Opening stop
Utah State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | UCLA | 7 | 46.7 | 3.3 | 7 |
| 2024 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | -7 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Utah State | 925 | 85.5 | 26.7 | 925 |
#1 Featured game
Air Force
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147
Primary metric
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
108
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
108 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UNLV
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 90.8 efficiency score.
#4
San José State
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 88.6 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
95
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
95 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Utah State
925 primary output · 85.5 efficiency · 26.7 usage
71
#2
2023 Regular Season · UCLA
37.7
7 primary · 46.7 efficiency · 3.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · UCLA
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.83
Bishop Chatard · Indianapolis, IN
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
932
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Braden Pegan quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit