Usage Score
23.8
Player Dossier
2012-2013UTSA
QB • 6'0" • Beeville, TX, USA
Eric Soza is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
23.8
Efficiency
63
Consistency
83
Season Value
67.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Eric Soza, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · UTSA. Eric Soza is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Eric Soza played QB for UTSA. Across 2 tracked seasons, Eric Soza recorded 4,804 passing yards, 733 rushing yards, and 45 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTSA paired 3,088 primary output with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win with 309 yards of offense and 85.3 efficiency. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
257.3
Efficiency
63
Usage
23.8
Consistency
83
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 285. Oklahoma State: 333. Arizona: 299. UTEP: 211. Houston: 332. Marshall: 135. Rice: 255. UAB: 283. Tulsa: 157. Tulane: 179. North Texas: 310. Louisiana Tech: 309
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 45 by 65.9. Oklahoma State: 47 by 60.8. Arizona: 54 by 58.6. UTEP: 29 by 65. Houston: 46 by 58.7. Marshall: 34 by 35.1. Rice: 48 by 62.6. UAB: 28 by 82.1. Tulsa: 27 by 72.2. Tulane: 32 by 50.3. North Texas: 59 by 58.9. Louisiana Tech: 25 by 85.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
85.3 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 30-10 | 17 | 20 | 271 | 85.0 | 1 | 1 | 85.3 | 5 | 38 | 7.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ North Texas | W 21-13 | 30 | 49 | 274 | 61.2 | 0 | 1 | 58.9 | 10 | 36 | 3.60 | 2 | 11 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Tulane | W 10-7 | 10 | 25 | 183 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 50.3 | 7 | -4 | -0.60 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Tulsa | W 34-15 | 16 | 20 | 114 | 80.0 | 1 | 0 | 72.2 | 7 | 43 | 6.10 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs UAB | W 52-31 | 14 | 21 | 235 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 82.1 | 7 | 48 | 6.90 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs RiceDual-threat | L 21-27 | 17 | 31 | 170 | 54.8 | 0 | 0 | 62.6 | 17 | 85 | 5 | 2 | 38 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Marshall | L 10-34 | 10 | 26 | 130 | 38.5 | 0 | 3 | 35.1 | 8 | 5 | 0.60 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Houston300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 28-59 | 29 | 40 | 316 | 72.5 | 2 | 3 | 58.7 | 6 | 16 | 2.70 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ UTEP | W 32-13 | 18 | 24 | 204 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 65 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ Arizona | L 13-38 | 30 | 46 | 277 | 65.2 | 0 | 1 | 58.6 | 8 | 22 | 2.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Oklahoma State300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 35-56 | 24 | 41 | 308 | 58.5 | 3 | 2 | 60.8 | 6 | 25 | 4.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/1 | @ New Mexico | W 21-13 | 21 | 34 | 237 | 61.8 | 2 | 0 | 65.9 | 11 | 48 | 4.40 | 0 | 24 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 2,449 | 66.5 | 19.2 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 3,088 | 63 | 23.8 | 639 |
#1 Featured game
Idaho
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
321
Primary metric
321 total offense with 74.6 efficiency.
#2
New Mexico State
324
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
324 total offense with 74.5 efficiency.
#3
Louisiana Tech
309
Primary metric
Win with 309 yards of offense and 85.3 efficiency.
309 total offense with 85.3 efficiency.
#4
New Mexico
285
Primary metric
Win with 285 yards of offense and 65.9 efficiency.
285 total offense with 65.9 efficiency.
#5
North Texas
310
Primary metric
Win with 310 yards of offense and 58.9 efficiency.
310 total offense with 58.9 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
3,088 primary output · 63 efficiency · 23.8 usage
67.5
#2
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
61.2
2,449 primary · 66.5 efficiency · 19.2 usage
8
250+ passing yards
7
300+ total offense
8
3+ TD games
15
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
5,537
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.