Usage Score
4.5
Player Dossier
2009-2012Marshall
WR • 5'10" • Sarasota, FL, USA
Andre Snipes-Booker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
4.5
Efficiency
66
Consistency
28
Season Value
34.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Marshall
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andre Snipes-Booker, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Marshall. Andre Snipes-Booker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Andre Snipes-Booker played WR for Marshall. Across 4 tracked seasons, Andre Snipes-Booker recorded 339 rushing yards, 468 receiving yards, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Marshall.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Marshall paired 236 primary output with 62.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
10.1
Efficiency
66
Usage
4.5
Consistency
28
Best Game by takeover score
Western Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 12. Western Carolina: 39. Ohio: 17. Rice: 19. Purdue: 4. Tulsa: 0. Southern Miss: 0. Memphis: 0. UAB: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 2 by 40. Western Carolina: 2 by 100. Ohio: 1 by 100. Rice: 2 by 63.3. Purdue: 1 by 26.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/10 | @ UAB | L 31-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Memphis | W 38-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Southern Miss | W 59-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Tulsa | L 38-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Purdue | L 41-51 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Rice | W 54-51 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Ohio | L 24-27 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Western Carolina | W 52-24 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ West Virginia | L 34-69 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Marshall
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Marshall | 25 | 32.2 | 10.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Marshall | 25 | 32.2 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Marshall | 236 | 62.7 | 8.3 | 211 |
| 2011 Postseason | Marshall | 116 | 86.7 | 11.3 | -120 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Marshall | 116 | 86.7 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Marshall | 91 | 66 | 4.5 | -25 |
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66
Primary metric
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#3
Tulane
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Carolina
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Marshall
236 primary output · 62.7 efficiency · 8.3 usage
55.8
#2
2011 Postseason · Marshall
38.7
116 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 11.3 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Marshall
38.7
116 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 11.3 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
468
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.