Usage Score
33.1
Player Dossier
2022-2025Toledo
Junior Vandeross III
WR • 5'8" • 182 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Junior Vandeross III reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73
Consistency
71.4
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Toledo
22232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Junior Vandeross III, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Toledo. Junior Vandeross III reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Toledo paired 1,008 primary output with 73 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Toledo
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
77.5
Efficiency
73
Usage
33.1
Consistency
71.4
Best Game by takeover score
Louisville
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 61. Kentucky: 88. Western Kentucky: 122. Unknown: 45. Western Michigan: 3. Akron: 122. Bowling Green: 100. Kent State: 76. Washington State: 52. Northern Illinois: 97. Miami (OH): 44. Ball State: 127. Central Michigan: 71
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 7 by 58.1. Kentucky: 7 by 83.8. Western Kentucky: 5 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 50. Western Michigan: 4 by 5. Akron: 9 by 90.4. Bowling Green: 6 by 100. Kent State: 8 by 63.3. Washington State: 7 by 49.5. Northern Illinois: 6 by 100. Miami (OH): 6 by 48.9. Ball State: 7 by 100. Central Michigan: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins94.1 · n=7 · +33.3 vs Losses
Losses60.8 · n=5 · -33.3 vs Wins
First Half77.3 · n=7 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half77.8 · n=6 · +0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Central Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/23 | @ Louisville | L 22-27 | — | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Central Michigan | W 21-3 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Ball State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 38-9 | — | 7 | 127 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 2 | 63 |
| Thu 11/13 | @ Miami (OH) | W 24-3 | — | 6 | 44 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 11/6 | vs Northern Illinois | W 42-3 | — | 6 | 97 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Washington State | L 7-28 | — | 7 | 52 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Kent StateHigh volume | W 45-10 | — | 8 | 76 | 8.6 | 9.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Bowling Green100 receiving yards | L 23-28 | — | 6 | 100 | 14.9 | 16.70 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Akron100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-3 | — | 9 | 122 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Western Michigan | L 13-14 | — | 4 | 3 | 0.8 | 0.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 2 | 15 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Western Kentucky100 receiving yards | W 45-21 | — | 5 | 122 | 24.4 | 24.40 | 1 | 71 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Kentucky | L 16-24 | — | 7 | 88 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Toledo | 18 | 100 | 4.5 | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Toledo | 664 | 76.2 | 21.1 | 646 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Toledo | 664 | 76.2 | 21.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Toledo | 957 | 69.7 | 30.6 | 293 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Toledo | 957 | 69.7 | 30.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Toledo | 1,008 | 73 | 33.1 | 51 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,008 | 73 | 33.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127
Primary metric
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
194
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
194 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Western Kentucky
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 90.4 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
147
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Toledo
1,008 primary output · 73 efficiency · 33.1 usage
69.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Toledo
69.4
1,008 primary · 73 efficiency · 33.1 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Toledo
65.6
957 primary · 69.7 efficiency · 30.6 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8411
Jesuit · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Toledo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,647
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.