Usage Score
3.6
Player Dossier
2009-2013Bowling Green
RB • 5'11" • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Jordan Hopgood leans balanced backfield option traits and 53.8 efficiency.
Usage Score
3.6
Efficiency
53.8
Consistency
54.8
Season Value
37.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Hopgood, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Jordan Hopgood leans balanced backfield option traits and 53.8 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 227 primary output with 27.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 53.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Scrimmage Yards / G
13.4
Efficiency
53.8
Usage
3.6
Consistency
54.8
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 3. Unknown: 40. Massachusetts: 13. Mississippi State: 12. Toledo: 1. Miami (OH): 21. Buffalo: 12. Northern Illinois: 5
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 1 by 31.3. Unknown: 2 by 100. Massachusetts: 2 by 67.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 33.3. Toledo: 1 by 10.4. Miami (OH): 3 by 72.9. Buffalo: 2 by 62.5. Northern Illinois: 1 by 52.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Unknown
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 227 | 27.5 | 13.8 | 227 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 266 | 33.4 | 15.9 | 39 |
| 2012 Postseason | Bowling Green | 123 | 69 | 4.2 | -143 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 123 | 69 | 4.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 107 | 53.8 | 3.6 | -16 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 127 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
127
Primary metric
127 scrimmage yards and 23.4 usage.
#2
Unknown
40
Primary metric
Game with 40 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
40 scrimmage yards and 2.9 usage.
#3
Eastern Michigan
61
Primary metric
Win with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
61 scrimmage yards and 14.3 usage.
#4
Marshall
45
Primary metric
Win with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
45 scrimmage yards and 10.3 usage.
#5
Ohio
32
Primary metric
Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 4.9 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
227 primary output · 27.5 efficiency · 13.8 usage
44.6
#2
2011 Regular Season · Bowling Green
43.9
266 primary · 33.4 efficiency · 15.9 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Bowling Green
37.9
107 primary · 53.8 efficiency · 3.6 usage
1
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8311
Princeton · Cincinnati, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
723
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Hopgood quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit