Usage Score
19.2
Player Dossier
2011-2013Middle Tennessee
WR • 5'10" • Columbus, GA, USA
Kyle Griswould reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.2
Efficiency
53.4
Consistency
37.4
Season Value
49.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Griswould, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Kyle Griswould reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kyle Griswould played WR for Middle Tennessee. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kyle Griswould recorded 93 rushing yards, 1,282 receiving yards, and 12 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Middle Tennessee.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 531 primary output with 65.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 53.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
35.8
Efficiency
53.4
Usage
19.2
Consistency
37.4
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 106. Western Carolina: 23. North Carolina: 65. Memphis: 8. Florida Atlantic: 31. BYU: 7. East Carolina: 40. North Texas: 17. Marshall: 59. UAB: 3. Florida International: 0. Southern Miss: 5. UTEP: 101
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 9 by 78.5. Western Carolina: 3 by 51.1. North Carolina: 7 by 61.9. Memphis: 2 by 26.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. BYU: 2 by 23.3. East Carolina: 6 by 44.4. North Texas: 2 by 56.7. Marshall: 4 by 98.3. UAB: 1 by 20. Florida International: 1 by 0. Southern Miss: 1 by 33.3. UTEP: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/30 | @ Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | L 6-24 | — | 9 | 106 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs UTEP100 receiving yards | W 48-17 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 0 | 69 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Southern Miss | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Florida International | W 48-0 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UAB | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Thu 10/24 | vs Marshall | W 51-49 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ North Texas | L 7-34 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs East Carolina | L 17-24 | — | 6 | 40 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ BYU | L 10-37 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 42-35 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Memphis | W 17-15 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ North Carolina | L 20-40 | — | 7 | 65 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Western Carolina | W 45-24 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Middle Tennessee
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 286 | 62.6 | 10.5 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 531 | 65.4 | 21.2 | 245 |
| 2013 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 465 | 53.4 | 19.2 | -66 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 465 | 53.4 | 19.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 78.5 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 94.3 efficiency score.
#4
North Texas
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
531 primary output · 65.4 efficiency · 21.2 usage
58.3
#2
2013 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
49.4
465 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 19.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
49.4
465 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 19.2 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,282
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.