Player Stats

Taysom Hill College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
9,739
Passing yards
6,929
Rushing yards
2,810
Touchdowns
75

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonBYU6759425334843.3
2013 PostseasonBYU13426293133181.6
2013 Regular SeasonBYU133,8562,6451,2112881.6
2014 Regular SeasonBYU51,4359754601567.2
2015 Regular SeasonBYU134026872364.7
2016 Regular SeasonBYU122,9232,3236002069.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

BYU paired 4,282 primary output with 63 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 60.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · BYU

Games

12

Primary Metric / G

243.6

Efficiency

60.9

Usage

28.2

Consistency

86.5

Best Game by takeover score

West Virginia

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 239. Utah: 263. UCLA: 243. West Virginia: 346. Toledo: 251. Michigan State: 185. Mississippi State: 214. Boise State: 235. Cincinnati: 205. Southern Utah: 349. Massachusetts: 246. Utah State: 147

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 40 by 66. Utah: 52 by 59.5. UCLA: 58 by 47.3. West Virginia: 49 by 66. Toledo: 27 by 63.9. Michigan State: 35 by 67. Mississippi State: 45 by 55.2. Boise State: 55 by 56. Cincinnati: 37 by 62.5. Southern Utah: 36 by 73.9. Massachusetts: 43 by 67. Utah State: 33 by 47

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins229.5 · Games = 8 · -42.3 vs Losses
Losses271.8 · Games = 4 · +42.3 vs Wins