Usage Score
28.2
Player Dossier
2012-2016BYU
QB • 6'2" • Pocatello, ID, USA
Taysom Hill is a pass-first distributor with 28.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
28.2
Efficiency
60.9
Consistency
86.5
Season Value
61
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · BYU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Taysom Hill, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · BYU. Taysom Hill is a pass-first distributor with 28.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Taysom Hill played QB for BYU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Taysom Hill recorded 6,929 passing yards, 2,810 rushing yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2013 with BYU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
BYU paired 4,282 primary output with 63 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 60.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
243.6
Efficiency
60.9
Usage
28.2
Consistency
86.5
Best Game by takeover score
West Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 239. Utah: 263. UCLA: 243. West Virginia: 346. Toledo: 251. Michigan State: 185. Mississippi State: 214. Boise State: 235. Cincinnati: 205. Southern Utah: 349. Massachusetts: 246. Utah State: 147
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 40 by 66. Utah: 52 by 59.5. UCLA: 58 by 47.3. West Virginia: 49 by 66. Toledo: 27 by 63.9. Michigan State: 35 by 67. Mississippi State: 45 by 55.2. Boise State: 55 by 56. Cincinnati: 37 by 62.5. Southern Utah: 36 by 73.9. Massachusetts: 43 by 67. Utah State: 33 by 47
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
West Virginia
Best efficiency game
73.9 vs Southern Utah
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | vs Utah State | W 28-10 | 10 | 21 | 101 | 47.6 | 1 | 2 | 47 | 12 | 46 | 3.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs MassachusettsDual-threat | W 51-9 | 18 | 30 | 165 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 13 | 81 | 6.20 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Southern Utah300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 37-7 | 22 | 29 | 320 | 75.9 | 2 | 1 | 73.9 | 7 | 29 | 4.10 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ CincinnatiDual-threat | W 20-3 | 15 | 25 | 130 | 60.0 | 0 | 1 | 62.5 | 12 | 75 | 6.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Fri 10/21 | @ Boise State | L 27-28 | 21 | 42 | 187 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 13 | 48 | 3.70 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Mississippi State3+ TD | W 28-21 | 16 | 28 | 165 | 57.1 | 3 | 1 | 55.2 | 17 | 49 | 2.90 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Michigan State | W 31-14 | 18 | 27 | 138 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 67 | 8 | 47 | 5.90 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Toledo | W 55-53 | 11 | 21 | 248 | 52.4 | 1 | 0 | 63.9 | 6 | 3 | 0.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ West VirginiaDual-threat | L 32-35 | 23 | 35 | 241 | 65.7 | 2 | 3 | 66 | 14 | 105 | 7.50 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs UCLA | L 14-17 | 26 | 48 | 250 | 54.2 | 1 | 1 | 47.3 | 10 | -7 | -0.70 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ UtahDual-threat | L 19-20 | 21 | 39 | 176 | 53.8 | 0 | 2 | 59.5 | 13 | 87 | 6.70 | 2 | 39 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Arizona | W 18-16 | 21 | 29 | 202 | 72.4 | 1 | 0 | 66 | 11 | 37 | 3.40 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
BYU
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | BYU | 759 | 68.4 | 21.2 | — |
| 2013 Postseason | BYU | 4,282 | 63 | 38.2 | 3,523 |
| 2013 Regular Season | BYU | 4,282 | 63 | 38.2 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | BYU | 1,435 | 68.9 | 38.1 | -2,847 |
| 2015 Regular Season | BYU | 340 | 73.9 | 34.6 | -1,095 |
| 2016 Regular Season | BYU | 2,923 | 60.9 | 28.2 | 2,583 |
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
405
Primary metric
405 total offense with 82.5 efficiency.
#2
Houston
545
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
545 total offense with 63.8 efficiency.
#3
Nebraska
340
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
340 total offense with 73.9 efficiency.
#4
Utah State
315
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
315 total offense with 63 efficiency.
#5
Washington
426
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
426 total offense with 59.4 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Postseason · BYU
4,282 primary output · 63 efficiency · 38.2 usage
69.9
#2
2013 Regular Season · BYU
69.9
4,282 primary · 63 efficiency · 38.2 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · BYU
61
2,923 primary · 60.9 efficiency · 28.2 usage
9
250+ passing yards
13
300+ total offense
12
3+ TD games
24
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
9,739
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.