Usage Score
7.7
Player Dossier
2009-2013Temple
Chris Coyer
QB • 6'3" • Oak Hill, VA, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Chris Coyer is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
62.7
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
21.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Temple
091011111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Coyer, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Temple. Chris Coyer is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Chris Coyer played QB for Temple. Across 5 tracked seasons, Chris Coyer recorded 1,456 passing yards, 1,058 rushing yards, and 290 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Temple.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Temple paired 1,390 primary output with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 62.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Idaho
Loss with 24 yards of offense and 48 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Temple
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
4.7
Efficiency
62.7
Usage
7.7
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Idaho
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 14. Houston: 4. Fordham: 0. Idaho: 24. Louisville: 0. Cincinnati: 0. SMU: 0. Rutgers: 0. Memphis: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 1 by 100. Houston: 1 by 40. Idaho: 5 by 48
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 1 · -5.3 vs Losses
Losses5.3 · Games = 8 · +5.3 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Idaho
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Memphis | W 41-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Rutgers | L 20-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ SMU | L 49-59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Cincinnati | L 20-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Louisville | L 7-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Idaho | L 24-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 48 | 5 | 24 | 4.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Fordham | L 29-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Houston | L 13-22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 1 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200920102011201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Temple | 64 | 68.2 | 5 | 64 |
| 2011 Postseason | Temple | 1,018 | 78.6 | 21.1 | 954 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Temple | 1,018 | 78.6 | 21.1 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Temple | 1,390 | 56.7 | 31 | 372 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Temple | 42 | 62.7 | 7.7 | -1,348 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
307
Primary metric
307 total offense with 82.6 efficiency.
#2
Maryland
231
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
231 total offense with 57.6 efficiency.
#3
South Florida
221
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
221 total offense with 74.7 efficiency.
#4
Miami (OH)
42
Primary metric
Loss with 42 yards of offense and 81.3 efficiency.
42 total offense with 81.3 efficiency.
#5
Penn State
188
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
188 total offense with 59.7 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Temple
1,390 primary output · 56.7 efficiency · 31 usage
66.2
#2
2011 Postseason · Temple
56.2
1,018 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 21.1 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Temple
56.2
1,018 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 21.1 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
1
3+ TD games
11
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,514
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Chris Coyer
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.