Usage Score
34.2
Player Dossier
2009-2010Akron
WR • 6'1" • Belle Chasse, LA, USA
Jeremy LaFrance reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
34.2
Efficiency
83.6
Consistency
78.4
Season Value
74
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Akron
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy LaFrance, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Akron. Jeremy LaFrance reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jeremy LaFrance played WR for Akron. Across 2 tracked seasons, Jeremy LaFrance recorded 10 rushing yards, 1,054 receiving yards, and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Akron.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Akron paired 534 primary output with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Gardner-Webb
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
59.3
Efficiency
83.6
Usage
34.2
Consistency
78.4
Best Game by takeover score
Gardner-Webb
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 75. Gardner-Webb: 88. Kentucky: 23. Indiana: 46. Northern Illinois: 57. Kent State: 75. Ball State: 46. Miami (OH): 59. Buffalo: 65
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 7 by 71.4. Gardner-Webb: 7 by 83.8. Kentucky: 1 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 100. Northern Illinois: 5 by 76. Kent State: 6 by 83.3. Ball State: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 6 by 65.6. Buffalo: 6 by 72.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Gardner-Webb
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/26 | vs Buffalo | W 22-14 | — | 6 | 65 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Wed 11/17 | vs Miami (OH) | L 14-19 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Ball State2+ TD | L 30-37 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Kent State | L 17-28 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.1 | 12.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Northern Illinois | L 14-50 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Indiana2+ TD | L 20-35 | — | 2 | 46 | 23 | 23 | 2 | 28 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Kentucky | L 10-47 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Gardner-Webb | L 37-38 | — | 7 | 88 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Syracuse | L 3-29 | — | 7 | 75 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 0 | 29 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Akron | 520 | 73.8 | 25.3 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Akron | 534 | 83.6 | 34.2 | 14 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126
Primary metric
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Gardner-Webb
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 83.8 efficiency score.
#3
Syracuse
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 71.4 efficiency score.
#4
Kent State
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 83.3 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 72.2 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Akron
534 primary output · 83.6 efficiency · 34.2 usage
74
#2
2009 Regular Season · Akron
64.2
520 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 25.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,054
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.