Usage Score
5.1
Player Dossier
2009-2011Akron
QB • 6'4" • Willoughby, OH, USA
Patrick Nicely is a balanced quarterback profile with 5.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
5.1
Efficiency
53
Consistency
34.7
Season Value
27.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Akron
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Nicely, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Akron. Patrick Nicely is a balanced quarterback profile with 5.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Patrick Nicely played QB for Akron. Across 3 tracked seasons, Patrick Nicely recorded 3,358 passing yards, -79 rushing yards, and 13 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Akron.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Akron paired 1,628 primary output with 46.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2011 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Loss with 95 yards of offense and 72 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
28.4
Efficiency
53
Usage
5.1
Consistency
34.7
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: -25. Temple: 42. Cincinnati: 7. VMI: 17. Ohio: 44. Miami (OH): 56. Kent State: 10. Buffalo: 95. Western Michigan: 10
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 6 by 34. Temple: 9 by 64.1. Cincinnati: 6 by 19.9. VMI: 1 by 100. Ohio: 9 by 53.3. Miami (OH): 14 by 60.4. Kent State: 6 by 43.5. Buffalo: 12 by 72. Western Michigan: 6 by 30
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
100 vs VMI
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | @ Western Michigan | L 19-68 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Buffalo | L 10-51 | 6 | 12 | 95 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Kent State | L 3-35 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 16.7 | 0 | 0 | 43.5 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Miami (OH) | L 3-35 | 4 | 13 | 48 | 30.8 | 0 | 0 | 60.4 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Ohio | L 20-37 | 4 | 7 | 43 | 57.1 | 1 | 0 | 53.3 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs VMI | W 36-13 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Cincinnati | L 14-59 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 16.7 | 0 | 1 | 19.9 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Temple | L 3-41 | 4 | 8 | 35 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 64.1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Ohio State | L 0-42 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 3 | -26 | -8.70 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Akron
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Akron | 1,395 | 55.6 | 18.1 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Akron | 1,628 | 46.4 | 16.5 | 233 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Akron | 256 | 53 | 5.1 | -1,372 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Loss with 95 yards of offense and 72 efficiency.
95
Primary metric
95 total offense with 72 efficiency.
#2
Bowling Green
292
Primary metric
Loss with 292 yards of offense and 70.8 efficiency.
292 total offense with 70.8 efficiency.
#3
VMI
17
Primary metric
Win with 17 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
17 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#4
Kent State
281
Primary metric
Win with 281 yards of offense and 60.4 efficiency.
281 total offense with 60.4 efficiency.
#5
Indiana
177
Primary metric
Loss with 177 yards of offense and 53.4 efficiency.
177 total offense with 53.4 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Akron
1,628 primary output · 46.4 efficiency · 16.5 usage
60
#2
2009 Regular Season · Akron
57.3
1,395 primary · 55.6 efficiency · 18.1 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Akron
27.1
256 primary · 53 efficiency · 5.1 usage
2
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
2
3+ TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
3,279
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.