Usage Score
24.9
Player Dossier
2009-2012Minnesota
WR • 6'1" • St. Paul, MN, USA
A.J. Barker reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
24.9
Efficiency
95.3
Consistency
63
Season Value
70.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Minnesota
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Barker, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · Minnesota. A.J. Barker reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
A.J. Barker played WR for Minnesota. Across 4 tracked seasons, A.J. Barker recorded 594 receiving yards and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Minnesota.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 577 primary output with 95.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 95.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
72.1
Efficiency
95.3
Usage
24.9
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 101. New Hampshire: 29. Western Michigan: 101. Syracuse: 52. Iowa: 74. Northwestern: 49. Wisconsin: 36. Purdue: 135
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 3 by 100. New Hampshire: 2 by 96.7. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 86.7. Iowa: 5 by 98.7. Northwestern: 3 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 80. Purdue: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/27 | vs Purdue100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 44-28 | — | 5 | 135 | 27 | 27 | 2 | 63 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Wisconsin | L 13-38 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Northwestern | L 13-21 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Iowa | L 13-31 | — | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Syracuse | W 17-10 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 28-23 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 3 | 53 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs New Hampshire | W 44-7 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Fri 8/31 | @ UNLV100 receiving yards | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 101 | 33.7 | 33.70 | 0 | 40 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Minnesota | 17 | 100 | 7.1 | 17 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | -17 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Minnesota | 577 | 95.3 | 24.9 | 577 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135
Primary metric
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UNLV
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 98.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · Minnesota
577 primary output · 95.3 efficiency · 24.9 usage
70.8
#2
2010 Regular Season · Minnesota
52.5
17 primary · 100 efficiency · 7.1 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Minnesota
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
594
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.