Usage Score
17
Player Dossier
2009-2012Missouri
WR • 6'0" • O'Fallon, MO, USA
T.J. Moe reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
17
Efficiency
65.4
Consistency
54.6
Season Value
43.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Missouri
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
T.J. Moe, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · Missouri. T.J. Moe reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
T.J. Moe played WR for Missouri. Across 4 tracked seasons, T.J. Moe recorded 71 passing yards, 168 rushing yards, and 2,101 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Missouri.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Missouri paired 1,045 primary output with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
33.3
Efficiency
65.4
Usage
17
Consistency
54.6
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SE Louisiana: 26. Georgia: 45. Arizona State: 88. South Carolina: 13. UCF: 29. Vanderbilt: 30. Alabama: 19. Kentucky: 8. Florida: 12. Tennessee: 33. Syracuse: 70. Texas A&M: 26
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SE Louisiana: 3 by 57.8. Georgia: 6 by 50. Arizona State: 8 by 73.3. South Carolina: 2 by 43.3. UCF: 3 by 64.4. Vanderbilt: 2 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 63.3. Kentucky: 1 by 53.3. Florida: 3 by 26.7. Tennessee: 3 by 73.3. Syracuse: 5 by 93.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 86.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | @ Texas A&M | L 29-59 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Syracuse | L 27-31 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Tennessee | W 51-48 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Florida | L 7-14 | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Kentucky | W 33-10 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Alabama | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 19 | 4.8 | 9.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Vanderbilt | L 15-19 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ UCF | W 21-16 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ South Carolina | L 10-31 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Arizona StateHigh volume | W 24-20 | — | 8 | 88 | 10.4 | 11 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Georgia | L 20-41 | — | 6 | 45 | 7 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs SE Louisiana | W 62-10 | — | 3 | 26 | 7 | 8.70 | 1 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Missouri
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Missouri | 8 | 26.7 | 8.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Missouri | 1,045 | 75.3 | 30.5 | 1,037 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Missouri | 1,045 | 75.3 | 30.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Missouri | 649 | 71.1 | 25.3 | -396 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Missouri | 649 | 71.1 | 25.3 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Missouri | 399 | 65.4 | 17 | -250 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa
152
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 67.6 efficiency score.
#5
San Diego State
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · Missouri
1,045 primary output · 75.3 efficiency · 30.5 usage
70.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Missouri
70.2
1,045 primary · 75.3 efficiency · 30.5 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Missouri
54.8
649 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 25.3 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,101
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.