Usage Score
27.8
Player Dossier
2009-2011Navy
Alexander Teich
FB • 6'0" • Conroe, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Alexander Teich leans balanced backfield option traits and 49.9 efficiency.
Efficiency
49.9
Consistency
73.7
Season Value
61.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Navy
0909101011
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Navy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alexander Teich, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Navy. Alexander Teich leans balanced backfield option traits and 49.9 efficiency.
Alexander Teich played FB for Navy. Across 3 tracked seasons, Alexander Teich recorded 37 passing yards, 2,122 rushing yards, and 136 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Navy.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Navy paired 908 primary output with 49.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 49.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Navy
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
82.5
Efficiency
49.9
Usage
27.8
Consistency
73.7
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Delaware: 65. Western Kentucky: 102. South Carolina: 95. Air Force: 162. Rutgers: 69. East Carolina: 42. Notre Dame: 70. Troy: 71. SMU: 90. San José State: 49. Army: 93
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Delaware: 14 by 48.4. Western Kentucky: 15 by 70.8. South Carolina: 16 by 63.5. Air Force: 37 by 44.7. Rutgers: 18 by 39.9. East Carolina: 13 by 34.8. Notre Dame: 17 by 43. Troy: 12 by 61.6. SMU: 21 by 44.6. San José State: 13 by 43.5. Army: 18 by 53.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins84.2 · Games = 5 · +3.0 vs Losses
Losses81.2 · Games = 6 · -3.0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/10 | vs Army | W 27-21 | 18 | 93 | 5.20 | 1 | — | — | 5.2 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ San José State | L 24-27 | 11 | 49 | 4.50 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3.8 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ SMU | W 24-17 | 21 | 90 | 4.30 | 0 | — | — | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Troy | W 42-14 | 12 | 71 | 5.90 | 1 | — | — | 5.9 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-56 | 15 | 62 | 4.10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 4.1 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs East Carolina | L 35-38 | 12 | 41 | 3.40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.2 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Rutgers | L 20-21 | 18 | 69 | 3.80 | 0 | — | — | 3.8 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Air Force100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 34-35 | 35 | 148 | 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ South Carolina | L 21-24 | 15 | 93 | 6.20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5.9 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Western Kentucky100 rush yards | W 40-14 | 15 | 102 | 6.80 | 0 | — | — | 6.8 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Delaware | W 40-17 | 14 | 65 | 4.60 | 0 | — | — | 4.6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20092009201020102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Navy | 401 | 51.6 | 10.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Navy | 401 | 51.6 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Navy | 949 | 54.9 | 20.2 | 548 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Navy | 949 | 54.9 | 20.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Navy | 908 | 49.9 | 27.8 | -41 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
241
Primary metric
241 scrimmage yards and 44.3 usage.
#2
Pittsburgh
103
Primary metric
Loss with 103 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
103 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#3
Air Force
162
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
162 scrimmage yards and 39.4 usage.
#4
East Carolina
157
Primary metric
Win with 157 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
157 scrimmage yards and 20.6 usage.
#5
Western Kentucky
102
Primary metric
Win with 102 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
102 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Navy
908 primary output · 49.9 efficiency · 27.8 usage
61.8
#2
2010 Postseason · Navy
54
949 primary · 54.9 efficiency · 20.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Navy
54
949 primary · 54.9 efficiency · 20.2 usage
Milestones
4
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,258
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Alexander Teich
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.