Usage Score
12.4
Player Dossier
2022-2024Texas
WR • 5'11" • 180 lbs • Buford, GA, USA
Isaiah Bond reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.4
Efficiency
81.1
Consistency
59.9
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Isaiah Bond, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama. Isaiah Bond reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Isaiah Bond played WR for Alabama and Texas. Across 3 tracked seasons, Isaiah Bond recorded 101 rushing yards, 1,428 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Texas.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Alabama paired 668 primary output with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
41.5
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
12.4
Consistency
59.9
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 8. Colorado State: 61. Michigan: 51. UTSA: 103. UL Monroe: 75. Mississippi State: 74. Oklahoma: 5. Georgia: 11. Florida: 55. Arkansas: 48. Kentucky: 27. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia: 22
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 1 by 53.3. Colorado State: 5 by 81.3. Michigan: 3 by 100. UTSA: 5 by 100. UL Monroe: 2 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 98.7. Oklahoma: 1 by 33.3. Georgia: 2 by 36.7. Florida: 3 by 100. Arkansas: 4 by 80. Kentucky: 2 by 90. Georgia: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/11 | vs Ohio State | L 14-28 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Georgia | L 19-22 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Texas A&M | W 17-7 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Kentucky | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Arkansas | W 20-10 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Florida | W 49-17 | — | 3 | 55 | 24.8 | 18.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Georgia | L 15-30 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-3 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 35-13 | — | 5 | 74 | 16.7 | 14.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-3 | — | 2 | 75 | 37.5 | 37.50 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UTSA100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-7 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Michigan | W 31-12 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Colorado State | W 52-0 | — | 5 | 61 | 14.3 | 12.20 | 1 | 23 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Alabama
2022-2023
Opening stop
Texas
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Alabama | 220 | 64.4 | 10.4 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 220 | 64.4 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Alabama | 668 | 82.7 | 22.8 | 448 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 668 | 82.7 | 22.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas | 540 | 81.1 | 12.4 | -128 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas | 540 | 81.1 | 12.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96
Primary metric
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Alabama
668 primary output · 82.7 efficiency · 22.8 usage
67.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · Alabama
67.3
668 primary · 82.7 efficiency · 22.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Texas
59.5
540 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 12.4 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9773
Buford · Buford, GA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,428
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.