Usage Score
12.4
Player Profile
Isaiah Bond
WR • 5'11" • 180 lbs • Buford, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Isaiah Bond reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.1
Consistency
59.9
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama
222223232424
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Alabama
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Isaiah Bond, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason · Alabama. Isaiah Bond reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Alabama paired 668 primary output with 82.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Alabama, Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Texas
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
41.5
Efficiency
81.1
Usage
12.4
Consistency
59.9
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 8. Colorado State: 61. Michigan: 51. UTSA: 103. UL Monroe: 75. Mississippi State: 74. Oklahoma: 5. Georgia: 11. Florida: 55. Arkansas: 48. Kentucky: 27. Texas A&M: 0. Georgia: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 1 by 53.3. Colorado State: 5 by 81.3. Michigan: 3 by 100. UTSA: 5 by 100. UL Monroe: 2 by 100. Mississippi State: 5 by 98.7. Oklahoma: 1 by 33.3. Georgia: 2 by 36.7. Florida: 3 by 100. Arkansas: 4 by 80. Kentucky: 2 by 90. Georgia: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins49.9 · n=10 · +36.2 vs Losses
Losses13.7 · n=3 · -36.2 vs Wins
First Half53.9 · n=7 · +26.7 vs Second Half
Second Half27.2 · n=6 · -26.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
100 vs Georgia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/11 | vs Ohio State | L 14-28 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 12/7 | vs Georgia | L 19-22 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Texas A&M | W 17-7 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Kentucky | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Arkansas | W 20-10 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Florida | W 49-17 | — | 3 | 55 | 24.8 | 18.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Georgia | L 15-30 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-3 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Mississippi State | W 35-13 | — | 5 | 74 | 16.7 | 14.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 9/22 | vs UL Monroe | W 51-3 | — | 2 | 75 | 37.5 | 37.50 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UTSA100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-7 | — | 5 | 103 | 20.6 | 20.60 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Michigan | W 31-12 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Colorado State | W 52-0 | — | 5 | 61 | 14.3 | 12.20 | 1 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Alabama
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Texas
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
202220222023202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Alabama | 220 | 64.4 | 10.4 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Alabama | 220 | 64.4 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Alabama | 668 | 82.7 | 22.8 | 448 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Alabama | 668 | 82.7 | 22.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas | 540 | 81.1 | 12.4 | -128 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas | 540 | 81.1 | 12.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
96
Primary metric
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UTSA
103
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arkansas
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Postseason · Alabama
668 primary output · 82.7 efficiency · 22.8 usage
67.3
#2
2023 Regular Season · Alabama
67.3
668 primary · 82.7 efficiency · 22.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Texas
59.5
540 primary · 81.1 efficiency · 12.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9773
Buford · Buford, GA
- Committed To
- Alabama
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,428
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.