Player Stats

Tate Forcier College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
2,938
Passing yards
2,647
Rushing yards
291
Touchdowns
21

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2009 Regular SeasonMichigan122,2902,0502401674.3
2010 Regular SeasonMichigan864859751534.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Michigan paired 2,290 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 55 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Iowa

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Michigan

Games

8

Primary Metric / G

81

Efficiency

55

Usage

7.5

Consistency

38

Best Game by takeover score

Iowa

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 140. Indiana: 0. Iowa: 238. Penn State: 0. Illinois: 147. Purdue: 20. Wisconsin: 29. Ohio State: 74

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 16 by 87.8. Indiana: 1 by 66.7. Iowa: 29 by 52.8. Penn State: 2 by 33.3. Illinois: 26 by 59.8. Purdue: 8 by 42. Wisconsin: 6 by 54.6. Ohio State: 18 by 43.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins76.8 · Games = 4 · -8.5 vs Losses
Losses85.3 · Games = 4 · +8.5 vs Wins