Usage / Role
16%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2010Michigan
QB • 6'1" • San Diego, CA, USA
Tate Forcier is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage / Role
16%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
15
Developing production for a quarterback
Reliability
21
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
33
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Michigan
Snapshot
Player Story
Tate Forcier built his college career from 2009 through 2010 as a quarterback from San Diego, CA wearing No. 5, spending time with Michigan. The clearest part of Tate Forcier's career was his passing role: 2,647...
Read the storyTate Forcier, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Michigan. Tate Forcier is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 12 | 2,290 | 2,050 | 240 | 16 | 74.3 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 8 | 648 | 597 | 51 | 5 | 34.5 |
Related Context
Tate Forcier played QB for Michigan. Across 2 tracked seasons, Tate Forcier recorded 2,647 passing yards, 291 rushing yards, and 21 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Michigan paired 2,290 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 55 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
81
Efficiency
55
Usage
7.5
Consistency
38
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 140. Indiana: 0. Iowa: 238. Penn State: 0. Illinois: 147. Purdue: 20. Wisconsin: 29. Ohio State: 74
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 16 by 87.8. Indiana: 1 by 66.7. Iowa: 29 by 52.8. Penn State: 2 by 33.3. Illinois: 26 by 59.8. Purdue: 8 by 42. Wisconsin: 6 by 54.6. Ohio State: 18 by 43.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
87.8 vs Bowling Green
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Ohio State | L 7-37 | 8 | 15 | 82 | 53.3 | 0 | 1 | 43.1 | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Wisconsin | L 28-48 | 3 | 5 | 35 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 54.6 | 1 | -6 | -6 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Purdue | W 27-16 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Illinois | W 67-65 | 12 | 19 | 114 | 63.2 | 2 | 1 | 59.8 | 7 | 33 | 4.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/31 | @ Penn State | L 31-41 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 33.3 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Iowa | L 28-38 | 17 | 26 | 239 | 65.4 | 1 | 2 | 52.8 | 3 | -1 | -0.30 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Indiana | W 42-35 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 66.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Bowling Green | W 65-21 | 12 | 12 | 110 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 87.8 | 4 | 30 | 7.50 | 0 | 16 |
Player Story
Tate Forcier built his college career from 2009 through 2010 as a quarterback from San Diego, CA wearing No. 5, spending time with Michigan. The clearest part of Tate Forcier's career was his passing role: 2,647 passing yards, 17 touchdown passes, 365 attempts, and 291 rushing yards across 20 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2009 with Michigan. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
Quarterback careers are usually judged first by volume, efficiency, and scoring chances. His career also includes 291 rushing yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 20 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Michigan.
The arc is straightforward: Tate Forcier moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 2,290 | 60.3 | 27.8 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 648 | 55 | 7.5 | -1,642 |
#1 Featured game
vs Notre Dame
Week 2 · W 38-34
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
310
Total Offense
81.3 takeover
310 total offense with 68 efficiency.
#2
@ Michigan State
Week 5 · L 20-26 · Conference game
250
Total Offense
78.5 takeover
Loss with 250 yards of offense and 54.9 efficiency.
250 total offense with 54.9 efficiency.
#3
vs Purdue
Week 10 · L 36-38 · Conference game
244
Total Offense
77.7 takeover
Loss with 244 yards of offense and 63.5 efficiency.
244 total offense with 63.5 efficiency.
#4
@ Illinois
Week 9 · L 13-38 · Conference game
281
Total Offense
72.2 takeover
Loss with 281 yards of offense and 67.9 efficiency.
281 total offense with 67.9 efficiency.
#5
vs Western Michigan
Week 1 · W 31-7
216
Total Offense
62.6 takeover
Win with 216 yards of offense and 68.3 efficiency.
216 total offense with 68.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Regular Season · Michigan
2,290 primary output · 60.3 efficiency · 27.8 usage
74.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Michigan
34.5
648 primary · 55 efficiency · 7.5 usage
1
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
3
3+ TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.