Usage Score
25.8
Player Dossier
2025-2025Iowa
QB • 6'2" • 235 lbs • Naperville, IL, USA
Mark Gronowski is a balanced quarterback profile with 25.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
25.8
Efficiency
61.6
Consistency
80.5
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Iowa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mark Gronowski, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Iowa. Mark Gronowski is a balanced quarterback profile with 25.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Mark Gronowski played QB for Iowa. Across 1 tracked season, Mark Gronowski recorded 1,741 passing yards, 545 rushing yards, and 5 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Iowa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Iowa paired 2,286 primary output with 61.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 61.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
175.8
Efficiency
61.6
Usage
25.8
Consistency
80.5
Best Game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Vanderbilt: 266. UAlbany: 83. Iowa State: 120. Massachusetts: 191. Rutgers: 241. Indiana: 151. Wisconsin: 116. Penn State: 198. Minnesota: 159. Oregon: 163. USC: 164. Michigan State: 204. Nebraska: 230
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Vanderbilt: 32 by 72.2. UAlbany: 26 by 53.3. Iowa State: 40 by 47.4. Massachusetts: 30 by 62.2. Rutgers: 31 by 73.8. Indiana: 33 by 54.2. Wisconsin: 28 by 53.5. Penn State: 25 by 68.2. Minnesota: 28 by 62.3. Oregon: 30 by 60.1. USC: 27 by 60. Michigan State: 33 by 61. Nebraska: 29 by 73
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
73.8 vs Rutgers
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | @ Vanderbilt3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 34-27 | 16 | 22 | 212 | 72.7 | 2 | 1 | 72.2 | 10 | 54 | 5.40 | 1 | 44 |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Nebraska3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 40-16 | 9 | 16 | 166 | 56.3 | 1 | 0 | 73 | 13 | 64 | 4.90 | 2 | 29 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Michigan StateDual-threat | W 20-17 | 12 | 22 | 147 | 54.5 | 1 | 1 | 61 | 11 | 57 | 5.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ USC | L 21-26 | 12 | 19 | 132 | 63.2 | 1 | 1 | 60 | 8 | 32 | 4 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Oregon | L 16-18 | 10 | 18 | 138 | 55.6 | 1 | 0 | 60.1 | 12 | 25 | 2.10 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Minnesota | W 41-3 | 12 | 19 | 135 | 63.2 | 1 | 0 | 62.3 | 9 | 24 | 2.70 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Penn StateDual-threat | W 25-24 | 10 | 16 | 68 | 62.5 | 0 | 1 | 68.2 | 9 | 130 | 14.40 | 2 | 67 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Wisconsin | W 37-0 | 17 | 24 | 107 | 70.8 | 0 | 1 | 53.5 | 4 | 9 | 2.30 | 1 | 5 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Indiana | L 15-20 | 19 | 25 | 144 | 76.0 | 0 | 1 | 54.2 | 8 | 7 | 0.90 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Rutgers3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 38-28 | 12 | 18 | 186 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 73.8 | 13 | 55 | 4.20 | 3 | 11 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Massachusetts3+ TD | W 47-7 | 16 | 24 | 179 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 62.2 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Iowa State | L 13-16 | 13 | 24 | 83 | 54.2 | 0 | 1 | 47.4 | 16 | 37 | 2.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UAlbany | W 34-7 | 8 | 15 | 44 | 53.3 | 1 | 0 | 53.3 | 11 | 39 | 3.50 | 1 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Iowa
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Iowa | 2,286 | 61.6 | 25.8 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Iowa | 2,286 | 61.6 | 25.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Game with 281 yards of offense and 54.9 efficiency.
281
Primary metric
281 total offense with 54.9 efficiency.
#2
Iowa
66
Primary metric
Game with 66 yards of offense and 41.6 efficiency.
66 total offense with 41.6 efficiency.
#3
Vanderbilt
266
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
266 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#4
Rutgers
241
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
241 total offense with 73.8 efficiency.
#5
Nebraska
230
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
230 total offense with 73 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Iowa
2,286 primary output · 61.6 efficiency · 25.8 usage
67
#2
2025 Regular Season · Iowa
67
2,286 primary · 61.6 efficiency · 25.8 usage
1
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
4
3+ TD games
9
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
2,286
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 15 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.