Usage Score
12.6
Player Dossier
2020-2025Indiana
TE • 6'2" • 243 lbs • Milwaukee, WI, USA
Riley Nowakowski reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.6
Efficiency
69.2
Consistency
46.5
Season Value
57.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Riley Nowakowski, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Riley Nowakowski reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Riley Nowakowski played TE for Wisconsin and Indiana. Across 6 tracked seasons, Riley Nowakowski recorded 2 rushing yards, 518 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Indiana.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wisconsin, Indiana.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
27.6
Efficiency
69.2
Usage
12.6
Consistency
46.5
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 17. Oregon: 18. Alabama: 36. Old Dominion: 15. Kennesaw State: 14. Illinois: 43. Iowa: 4. Oregon: 11. Michigan State: 54. UCLA: 17. Maryland: 22. Penn State: 51. Wisconsin: 65. Ohio State: 20
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 2 by 56.7. Oregon: 2 by 60. Alabama: 3 by 80. Old Dominion: 2 by 50. Kennesaw State: 1 by 93.3. Illinois: 1 by 100. Iowa: 1 by 26.7. Oregon: 3 by 24.4. Michigan State: 3 by 100. UCLA: 3 by 37.8. Maryland: 2 by 73.3. Penn State: 3 by 100. Wisconsin: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/20 | vs Miami | W 27-21 | — | 2 | 17 | 6 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 1/10 | vs Oregon | W 56-22 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 1/1 | vs Alabama | W 38-3 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Ohio State | W 13-10 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Wisconsin | W 31-7 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Penn State | W 27-24 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Maryland | W 55-10 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UCLA | W 56-6 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Michigan State | W 38-13 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Oregon | W 30-20 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Iowa | W 20-15 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Illinois | W 63-10 | — | 1 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kennesaw State | W 56-9 | — | 1 | 14 | 7.5 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Old Dominion | W 27-14 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2020-2024
Opening stop
Indiana
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Wisconsin | 57 | 50.7 | 7.1 | 57 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 57 | 50.7 | 7.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 74 | 47.1 | 8.5 | 17 |
| 2025 Postseason | Indiana | 387 | 69.2 | 12.6 | 313 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Indiana | 387 | 69.2 | 12.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65
Primary metric
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
31
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
54
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
22
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2020 Regular Season · Wisconsin
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2025 Postseason · Indiana
57.1
387 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 12.6 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Indiana
57.1
387 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 12.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
518
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.