Usage Score
20.2
Player Dossier
2020-2022Penn State
WR • 6'1" • 206 lbs • Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Mitchell Tinsley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.2
Efficiency
76.3
Consistency
71.6
Season Value
52.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mitchell Tinsley, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky. Mitchell Tinsley reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Mitchell Tinsley played WR for Western Kentucky and Penn State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Mitchell Tinsley recorded 5 rushing yards, 2,356 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2021 with Western Kentucky.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Postseason
Western Kentucky paired 1,402 primary output with 89.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Western Kentucky, Penn State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
44.4
Efficiency
76.3
Usage
20.2
Consistency
71.6
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 49. Purdue: 84. Ohio: 27. Auburn: 47. Central Michigan: 51. Northwestern: 16. Michigan: 57. Minnesota: 58. Ohio State: 24. Indiana: 63. Maryland: 25. Rutgers: 63. Michigan State: 13
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 6 by 54.4. Purdue: 7 by 80. Ohio: 3 by 60. Auburn: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 4 by 85. Northwestern: 2 by 53.3. Michigan: 5 by 76. Minnesota: 4 by 96.7. Ohio State: 5 by 32. Indiana: 5 by 84. Maryland: 1 by 100. Rutgers: 5 by 84. Michigan State: 1 by 86.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Utah | W 35-21 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Michigan State | W 35-16 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rutgers | W 55-10 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Maryland | W 30-0 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Indiana | W 45-14 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Ohio State | L 31-44 | — | 5 | 24 | 4.8 | 4.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Minnesota | W 45-17 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Michigan | L 17-41 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Northwestern | W 17-7 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Central Michigan | W 33-14 | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn | W 41-12 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Ohio | W 46-10 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 14 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Purdue | W 35-31 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 27 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Kentucky
2020-2021
Opening stop
Penn State
2022
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 377 | 57.7 | 21 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 377 | 57.7 | 21 | 0 |
| 2021 Postseason | Western Kentucky | 1,402 | 89.6 | 18.4 | 1,025 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 1,402 | 89.6 | 18.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Postseason | Penn State | 577 | 76.3 | 20.2 | -825 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Penn State | 577 | 76.3 | 20.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
198
Primary metric
198 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTSA
173
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Liberty
69
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2021 Postseason · Western Kentucky
1,402 primary output · 89.6 efficiency · 18.4 usage
69.7
#2
2021 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
69.7
1,402 primary · 89.6 efficiency · 18.4 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Penn State
52.3
577 primary · 76.3 efficiency · 20.2 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,356
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.