Usage Score
12
Player Dossier
2020-2025Rice
LB • 6'2" • 230 lbs • Mansfield, TX, USA
Andrew Awe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 45.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
12
Efficiency
45.8
Consistency
36.9
Season Value
48.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Awe, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Rice. Andrew Awe shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 45.8 disruption score.
Andrew Awe played LB for Rice. Across 6 tracked seasons, Andrew Awe recorded 176 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Rice.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Rice paired 17 primary output with 45.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 45.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
45.8
Usage
12
Consistency
36.9
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas State: 4. Louisiana: 0. Houston: 1. Prairie View A&M: 2. Charlotte: 1. Navy: 0. Florida Atlantic: 1. UTSA: 1. UConn: 2. UAB: 4. North Texas: 0. South Florida: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas State: 5 by 60.8. Louisiana: 7 by 29.2. Houston: 6 by 35. Prairie View A&M: 5 by 40.8. Charlotte: 11 by 55.8. Navy: 9 by 37.5. Florida Atlantic: 10 by 51.7. UTSA: 5 by 30.8. UConn: 6 by 45. UAB: 7 by 69.2. North Texas: 8 by 33.3. South Florida: 14 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | @ Texas StateSplash game | L 10-41 | 5 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/30 | @ South Florida10+ tackles | L 3-52 | 14 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/23 | vs North Texas | L 24-56 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs UAB2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-17 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UConnSplash game | W 37-34 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ UTSA | L 13-61 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Florida Atlantic10+ tackles | L 21-27 | 10 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Navy | L 13-21 | 9 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/18 | @ Charlotte10+ tackles | W 28-17 | 11 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Prairie View A&MSplash game | W 38-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Houston | L 9-35 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/31 | @ Louisiana | W 14-12 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2020-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Rice | 1.5 | 20.5 | 6 | 1.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Rice | 6 | 19.3 | 5.2 | 4.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Rice | 6 | 19.3 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Rice | 6 | 24.3 | 5.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Rice | 17 | 45.8 | 12 | 11 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Rice | 17 | 45.8 | 12 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 63.4 takeover score.
#2
Texas State
4
Primary metric
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.4 takeover score.
#3
South Florida
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 57.2 takeover score.
#4
Texas State
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55 takeover score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Rice
17 primary output · 45.8 efficiency · 12 usage
48.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · Rice
48.7
17 primary · 45.8 efficiency · 12 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Rice
18.9
6 primary · 24.3 efficiency · 5.8 usage
2
Impact games
7
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
176
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 34 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.