Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2020-2025Texas A&M
TE • 6'4" • 250 lbs • Aurora, NE, USA
Nate Boerkircher reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
10.2
Efficiency
65.5
Consistency
55.5
Season Value
57.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Boerkircher, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Nate Boerkircher reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Nate Boerkircher played TE for Nebraska and Texas A&M. Across 6 tracked seasons, Nate Boerkircher recorded 16 rushing yards, 423 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 204 primary output with 65.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 65.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Nebraska, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
18.5
Efficiency
65.5
Usage
10.2
Consistency
55.5
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 33. UTSA: 17. Notre Dame: 11. Auburn: 9. Mississippi State: 7. Florida: 35. Arkansas: 29. LSU: 0. Missouri: 15. South Carolina: 40. Texas: 8
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 2 by 100. UTSA: 2 by 56.7. Notre Dame: 1 by 73.3. Auburn: 1 by 60. Mississippi State: 1 by 46.7. Florida: 3 by 77.8. Arkansas: 4 by 48.3. Missouri: 2 by 50. South Carolina: 3 by 88.9. Texas: 1 by 53.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-9 | — | 1 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | — | 1 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 13 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Nebraska
2020-2024
Opening stop
Texas A&M
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Nebraska | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Nebraska | 14 | 46.7 | 6.9 | 14 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Nebraska | 52 | 46.7 | 8.6 | 38 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Nebraska | 51 | 55 | 11.7 | -1 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Nebraska | 102 | 89.2 | 6.1 | 51 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 204 | 65.5 | 10.2 | 102 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 204 | 65.5 | 10.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33
Primary metric
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
32
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
32 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
South Carolina
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
33
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
204 primary output · 65.5 efficiency · 10.2 usage
57.8
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
57.8
204 primary · 65.5 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Nebraska
53.8
102 primary · 89.2 efficiency · 6.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
423
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.