Usage Score
14.1
Player Dossier
2020-2025Indiana
WR • 6'4" • 203 lbs • Phenix City, AL, USA
E.J. Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.1
Efficiency
71.2
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
59.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Indiana
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
E.J. Williams, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Indiana. E.J. Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
E.J. Williams played WR for Clemson and Indiana. Across 6 tracked seasons, E.J. Williams recorded 1,205 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Indiana.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Indiana paired 438 primary output with 71.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 71.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Clemson, Indiana.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
33.7
Efficiency
71.2
Usage
14.1
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 13. Alabama: 9. Old Dominion: 45. Kennesaw State: 27. Indiana State: 27. Illinois: 17. Iowa: 37. Michigan State: 59. UCLA: 109. Maryland: 15. Penn State: 16. Wisconsin: 52. Ohio State: 12
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 1 by 86.7. Alabama: 1 by 60. Old Dominion: 5 by 60. Kennesaw State: 3 by 60. Indiana State: 2 by 90. Illinois: 3 by 37.8. Iowa: 1 by 100. Michigan State: 5 by 78.7. UCLA: 5 by 100. Maryland: 2 by 50. Penn State: 2 by 53.3. Wisconsin: 5 by 69.3. Ohio State: 1 by 80
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCLA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/10 | vs Oregon | W 56-22 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 13 |
| Thu 1/1 | vs Alabama | W 38-3 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Ohio State | W 13-10 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Wisconsin | W 31-7 | — | 5 | 52 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Penn State | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Maryland | W 55-10 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UCLA100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 56-6 | — | 5 | 109 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 2 | 62 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Michigan State | W 38-13 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Iowa | W 20-15 | — | 1 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 0 | 37 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Illinois | W 63-10 | — | 3 | 17 | 5.7 | 5.70 | 1 | 11 |
| Fri 9/12 | vs Indiana State | W 73-0 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kennesaw State | W 56-9 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Old Dominion | W 27-14 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 22 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2020-2022
Opening stop
Indiana
2023-2025
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Postseason | Clemson | 306 | 68.8 | 8.6 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Clemson | 306 | 68.8 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Clemson | 66 | 46.7 | 8.8 | -240 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Clemson | 70 | 59.5 | 6.3 | 4 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Indiana | 276 | 74 | 18.4 | 206 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Indiana | 49 | 90 | 4.1 | -227 |
| 2025 Postseason | Indiana | 438 | 71.2 | 14.1 | 389 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Indiana | 438 | 71.2 | 14.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97
Primary metric
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UCLA
109
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Notre Dame
80
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Northwestern
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Furman
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 84.4 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Indiana
438 primary output · 71.2 efficiency · 14.1 usage
59.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Indiana
59.2
438 primary · 71.2 efficiency · 14.1 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Indiana
54
276 primary · 74 efficiency · 18.4 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.9682
Central · Phenix City, AL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,205
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.