Player Stats

TJ Quinn College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
282
TFL
14.5
Sacks
5
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2021 Regular SeasonLouisville12-0--039.7
2022 Regular SeasonLouisville7160.501-012.3
2023 PostseasonLouisville145-0--055
2023 Regular SeasonLouisville148220.552055
2024 PostseasonLouisville133-0--032.9
2024 Regular SeasonLouisville137941.5--032.9
2025 PostseasonLouisville1381.50--067.7
2025 Regular SeasonLouisville13876.5314067.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Louisville paired 18 primary output with 43.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 43.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Louisville

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

43.9

Usage

10.5

Consistency

39.5

Best Game by takeover score

Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 1.5. Eastern Kentucky: 0. James Madison: 2. Bowling Green: 0. Pittsburgh: 4. Virginia: 1. Miami: 1.5. Boston College: 1.5. Virginia Tech: 1. California: 0. Clemson: 0. SMU: 0. Kentucky: 5.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 8 by 48.3. Eastern Kentucky: 3 by 12.5. James Madison: 11 by 65.8. Bowling Green: 3 by 12.5. Pittsburgh: 5 by 60.8. Virginia: 9 by 47.5. Miami: 6 by 40. Boston College: 12 by 65. Virginia Tech: 10 by 51.7. California: 8 by 33.3. Clemson: 5 by 20.8. SMU: 5 by 20.8. Kentucky: 10 by 91.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.9 · Games = 9 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 4 · -1.6 vs Wins