Player Dossier

2021-2025

Louisville

TJ Quinn

LB • 6'1" • 235 lbs • Valdosta, GA, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

TJ Quinn shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.9 disruption score.

Usage Score

10.5

Efficiency

43.9

Consistency

39.5

Season Value

48.5

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Louisville

2122232324242525

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Louisville
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

TJ Quinn, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Louisville. TJ Quinn shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 43.9 disruption score.

TJ Quinn played LB for Louisville. Across 5 tracked seasons, TJ Quinn recorded 282 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Louisville.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Louisville paired 18 primary output with 43.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 43.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Louisville

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

43.9

Usage

10.5

Consistency

39.5

Best Game by takeover score

Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 1.5. Eastern Kentucky: 0. James Madison: 2. Bowling Green: 0. Pittsburgh: 4. Virginia: 1. Miami: 1.5. Boston College: 1.5. Virginia Tech: 1. California: 0. Clemson: 0. SMU: 0. Kentucky: 5.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 8 by 48.3. Eastern Kentucky: 3 by 12.5. James Madison: 11 by 65.8. Bowling Green: 3 by 12.5. Pittsburgh: 5 by 60.8. Virginia: 9 by 47.5. Miami: 6 by 40. Boston College: 12 by 65. Virginia Tech: 10 by 51.7. California: 8 by 33.3. Clemson: 5 by 20.8. SMU: 5 by 20.8. Kentucky: 10 by 91.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.9 · Games = 9 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 4 · -1.6 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

Kentucky

Best efficiency game

91.7 vs Kentucky

Result
Tue 12/23vs ToledoW 27-22861.5000
Sat 11/29vs Kentucky10+ tackles · 2+ sacksW 41-01062.5021
Sat 11/22@ SMUL 6-3852000
Sat 11/15vs ClemsonL 19-2053000
Sun 11/9vs CaliforniaL 26-2984000
Sat 11/1@ Virginia Tech10+ tacklesW 28-16104100
Sat 10/25vs Boston College10+ tacklesW 38-241250.5001
Fri 10/17@ MiamiW 24-21640.5001
Sat 10/4vs VirginiaL 27-3094100
Sat 9/27@ PittsburghSplash gameW 34-27520021
Sat 9/20vs Bowling GreenW 40-1730000
Fri 9/5vs James Madison10+ tackles · Splash gameW 28-14115110
Sat 8/30vs Eastern KentuckyW 51-1730000

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Louisville

    2021-2025

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

20212022202320232024202420252025
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2021 Regular SeasonLouisville08.31.3
2022 Regular SeasonLouisville1.511.72.41.5
2023 PostseasonLouisville10.533.48.89
2023 Regular SeasonLouisville10.533.48.80
2024 PostseasonLouisville5.530.27-5
2024 Regular SeasonLouisville5.530.270
2025 PostseasonLouisville1843.910.512.5
2025 Regular SeasonLouisville1843.910.50

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Kentucky

Win with backfield disruption leading the way.

5.5

Primary metric

5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 71.6 takeover score.

#2

Notre Dame

2

Primary metric

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 56.2 takeover score.

#3

Pittsburgh

4

Primary metric

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

4 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.

#4

Kentucky

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.3 takeover score.

#5

Wake Forest

1

Primary metric

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

1 disruption/tackle impact with 48.5 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2025 Postseason · Louisville

18 primary output · 43.9 efficiency · 10.5 usage

48.5

#2

2025 Regular Season · Louisville

48.5

18 primary · 43.9 efficiency · 10.5 usage

#3

2023 Postseason · Louisville

38.8

10.5 primary · 33.4 efficiency · 8.8 usage

Milestones

1

Impact games

6

Splash games

9

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

282

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 48 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.