Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2021-2025Iowa State
Tyler Onyedim
DT • 6'3" • 295 lbs • Richmond, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Tyler Onyedim shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.6 disruption score.
Efficiency
24.6
Consistency
30.9
Season Value
22.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Iowa State
21222323242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Iowa State • Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Onyedim, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Iowa State. Tyler Onyedim shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.6 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Iowa State paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Iowa State, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
24.6
Usage
7.4
Consistency
30.9
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 2. UTSA: 0. Utah State: 0. Notre Dame: 0.5. Auburn: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Florida: 0. Arkansas: 0.5. LSU: 0. Missouri: 2. South Carolina: 2. Unknown: 0. Texas: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 3 by 32.5. UTSA: 3 by 12.5. Utah State: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 7 by 34.2. Auburn: 4 by 16.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 26.7. Florida: 3 by 12.5. Arkansas: 3 by 17.5. LSU: 3 by 12.5. Missouri: 5 by 40.8. South Carolina: 6 by 45. Unknown: 0 by 0. Texas: 5 by 60.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=10 · -2.4 vs Losses
Losses3 · n=2 · +2.4 vs Wins
First Half0.5 · n=7 · -0.9 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · n=6 · +0.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ TexasSplash game | L 17-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ MissouriSplash game | W 38-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-9 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa State
2021-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202220232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Iowa State | 0 | 8.3 | 1.4 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Iowa State | 5 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Iowa State | 8.5 | 20 | 6 | 3.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Iowa State | 8.5 | 20 | 6 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Iowa State | 3.5 | 15.7 | 4 | -5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 12 | 24.6 | 7.4 | 8.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 12 | 24.6 | 7.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#2
Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.4 takeover score.
#3
Baylor
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#4
Texas Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Iowa State
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.4 usage
36.6
#2
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
22.2
12 primary · 24.6 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
22.2
12 primary · 24.6 efficiency · 7.4 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8422
Foster · Richmond, TX
- Committed To
- Iowa State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
138
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 48 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.