Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2021-2025Texas A&M
DT • 6'3" • 295 lbs • Richmond, TX, USA
Tyler Onyedim shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.4
Efficiency
24.6
Consistency
30.9
Season Value
22.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Iowa State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Onyedim, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season · Iowa State. Tyler Onyedim shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 24.6 disruption score.
Tyler Onyedim played DT for Iowa State and Texas A&M. Across 5 tracked seasons, Tyler Onyedim recorded 138 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2021 Regular Season
Iowa State paired 0 primary output with 8.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 24.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Iowa State, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
24.6
Usage
7.4
Consistency
30.9
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 2. UTSA: 0. Utah State: 0. Notre Dame: 0.5. Auburn: 0. Mississippi State: 1. Florida: 0. Arkansas: 0.5. LSU: 0. Missouri: 2. South Carolina: 2. Unknown: 0. Texas: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 3 by 32.5. UTSA: 3 by 12.5. Utah State: 2 by 8.3. Notre Dame: 7 by 34.2. Auburn: 4 by 16.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 26.7. Florida: 3 by 12.5. Arkansas: 3 by 17.5. LSU: 3 by 12.5. Missouri: 5 by 40.8. South Carolina: 6 by 45. Unknown: 0 by 0. Texas: 5 by 60.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
60.8 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ TexasSplash game | L 17-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | 6 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ MissouriSplash game | W 38-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State | W 31-9 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Iowa State
2021-2024
Opening stop
Texas A&M
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Iowa State | 0 | 8.3 | 1.4 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Iowa State | 5 | 11.8 | 7.7 | 5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Iowa State | 8.5 | 20 | 6 | 3.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Iowa State | 8.5 | 20 | 6 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Iowa State | 3.5 | 15.7 | 4 | -5 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 12 | 24.6 | 7.4 | 8.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 12 | 24.6 | 7.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.5 takeover score.
#2
Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.4 takeover score.
#3
Baylor
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.4 takeover score.
#4
Texas Tech
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2021 Regular Season · Iowa State
0 primary output · 8.3 efficiency · 1.4 usage
36.6
#2
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
22.2
12 primary · 24.6 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
22.2
12 primary · 24.6 efficiency · 7.4 usage
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8422
Foster · Richmond, TX
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
138
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 48 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.