Player Stats

Dominic Lovett College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,239
Receptions
195
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonMissouri1024032.9
2021 Regular SeasonMissouri1024169132.9
2022 Regular SeasonMissouri1256846385.1
2023 PostseasonGeorgia14338165
2023 Regular SeasonGeorgia1451575365
2024 PostseasonGeorgia14336068.6
2024 Regular SeasonGeorgia1456571668.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season

Missouri paired 846 primary output with 82.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2024 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Missouri, Georgia.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2024 Postseason · Georgia

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

43.4

Efficiency

67

Usage

18.2

Consistency

75.3

Best Game by takeover score

Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 36. Clemson: 33. Tennessee Tech: 33. Kentucky: 89. Alabama: 59. Auburn: 38. Mississippi State: 50. Texas: 35. Florida: 52. Ole Miss: 41. Tennessee: 59. Massachusetts: 35. Georgia Tech: 47. Texas: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 3 by 80. Clemson: 3 by 73.3. Tennessee Tech: 3 by 73.3. Kentucky: 6 by 98.9. Alabama: 6 by 65.6. Auburn: 4 by 63.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 66.7. Texas: 4 by 58.3. Florida: 7 by 49.5. Ole Miss: 4 by 68.3. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 77.8. Georgia Tech: 5 by 62.7. Texas: 3 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins42.8 · Games = 11 · -2.5 vs Losses
Losses45.3 · Games = 3 · +2.5 vs Wins