Usage Score
18.2
Player Dossier
2021-2024Georgia
WR • 5'10" • 179 lbs • Belleville, IL, USA
Dominic Lovett reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
18.2
Efficiency
67
Consistency
75.3
Season Value
58
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · Missouri
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dominic Lovett, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2022 Regular Season · Missouri. Dominic Lovett reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Dominic Lovett played WR for Missouri and Georgia. Across 4 tracked seasons, Dominic Lovett recorded 46 rushing yards, 2,239 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2022 with Missouri.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Missouri paired 846 primary output with 82.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Missouri, Georgia.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
43.4
Efficiency
67
Usage
18.2
Consistency
75.3
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 36. Clemson: 33. Tennessee Tech: 33. Kentucky: 89. Alabama: 59. Auburn: 38. Mississippi State: 50. Texas: 35. Florida: 52. Ole Miss: 41. Tennessee: 59. Massachusetts: 35. Georgia Tech: 47. Texas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 3 by 80. Clemson: 3 by 73.3. Tennessee Tech: 3 by 73.3. Kentucky: 6 by 98.9. Alabama: 6 by 65.6. Auburn: 4 by 63.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 66.7. Texas: 4 by 58.3. Florida: 7 by 49.5. Ole Miss: 4 by 68.3. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 77.8. Georgia Tech: 5 by 62.7. Texas: 3 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/2 | vs Notre Dame | L 10-23 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 12/7 | @ Texas | W 22-19 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Georgia Tech2+ TD | W 44-42 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Massachusetts | W 59-21 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Tennessee | W 31-17 | — | 3 | 59 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Ole Miss | L 10-28 | — | 4 | 41 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Florida | W 34-20 | — | 7 | 52 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Texas | W 30-15 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Mississippi State | W 41-31 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Auburn | W 31-13 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Alabama | L 34-41 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Kentucky | W 13-12 | — | 6 | 89 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Tennessee Tech | W 48-3 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Clemson | W 34-3 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Missouri
2021-2022
Opening stop
Georgia
2023-2024
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Missouri | 173 | 35.7 | 11.3 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Missouri | 173 | 35.7 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Missouri | 846 | 82.4 | 28.5 | 673 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia | 613 | 70.4 | 17.4 | -233 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia | 613 | 70.4 | 17.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Georgia | 607 | 67 | 18.2 | -6 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Georgia | 607 | 67 | 18.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
148
Primary metric
148 receiving yards with a 98.7 efficiency score.
#2
Kentucky
89
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
89 receiving yards with a 98.9 efficiency score.
#3
Arkansas
130
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Abilene Christian
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2022 Regular Season · Missouri
846 primary output · 82.4 efficiency · 28.5 usage
68.5
#2
2024 Postseason · Georgia
58
607 primary · 67 efficiency · 18.2 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Georgia
58
607 primary · 67 efficiency · 18.2 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8986
East St. Louis · Belleville, IL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,239
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.