Usage Score
19.8
Player Profile
WR • 6'1" • 195 lbs • Southlake, TX, USA
Brady Boyd reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
19.8
Efficiency
86.4
Consistency
60.7
Season Value
66.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Utah State
Quick Facts
Brady Boyd, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Utah State. Brady Boyd reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Utah State paired 743 primary output with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Minnesota, Texas Tech, Utah State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nevada
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
57.2
Efficiency
86.4
Usage
19.8
Consistency
60.7
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington State: 99. UTEP: 31. Texas A&M: 87. Air Force: 72. Unknown: 84. Vanderbilt: 14. Hawai'i: 68. San José State: 48. New Mexico: 27. Nevada: 117. UNLV: 39. Fresno State: 42. Boise State: 15
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 4 by 100. UTEP: 3 by 68.9. Texas A&M: 6 by 96.7. Air Force: 4 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. Vanderbilt: 2 by 46.7. Hawai'i: 5 by 90.7. San José State: 3 by 100. New Mexico: 2 by 90. Nevada: 5 by 100. UNLV: 3 by 86.7. Fresno State: 3 by 93.3. Boise State: 2 by 50
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nevada
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/22 | vs Washington State | L 21-34 | — | 4 | 99 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 1 | 43 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Boise State | L 24-25 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/23 | @ Fresno State | W 28-17 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ UNLV | L 26-29 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs Nevada100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 51-14 | — | 5 | 117 | 23.4 | 23.40 | 2 | 53 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ New Mexico | L 14-33 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs San José State | W 30-25 | — | 3 | 48 | 13 | 16 | 0 | 27 |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Hawai'i | L 26-44 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Vanderbilt | L 35-55 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 84 | 18 | 21 | 2 | 53 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Air Force | W 49-30 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Texas A&M | L 22-44 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTEP | W 28-16 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2021
Opening stop
Texas Tech
2022-2024
Peak year stop
Utah State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Minnesota | 18 | 60 | 8.7 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Texas Tech | 110 | 64.2 | 6.1 | 92 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 110 | 64.2 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas Tech | 41 | 47.8 | 10.8 | -69 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 41 | 47.8 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 7 | 46.7 | 4.2 | -34 |
| 2025 Postseason | Utah State | 743 | 86.4 | 19.8 | 736 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Utah State | 743 | 86.4 | 19.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Nevada
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117
Primary metric
117 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Washington State
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Texas A&M
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
California
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#5
Kansas State
18
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Utah State
743 primary output · 86.4 efficiency · 19.8 usage
66.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · Utah State
66.7
743 primary · 86.4 efficiency · 19.8 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Texas Tech
41
110 primary · 64.2 efficiency · 6.1 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2026 · Rating 0.8578
Bedford · Bedford, MA
Career Facts
3
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
919
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Brady Boyd quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit