Usage Score
22.9
Player Profile
Trebor Pena
WR • 5'10" • 186 lbs • Ocean Township, NJ, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Trebor Pena reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.8
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
50.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Syracuse
202122222324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Primary stop by seasons
- Syracuse
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Syracuse
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Trebor Pena, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Syracuse. Trebor Pena reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Syracuse paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Syracuse, Penn State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Penn State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
42.5
Efficiency
64.8
Usage
22.9
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 100. Nevada: 74. Florida International: 32. Unknown: 60. Oregon: 16. UCLA: 15. Northwestern: 5. Iowa: 19. Ohio State: 11. Indiana: 99. Michigan State: 38. Nebraska: 47. Rutgers: 36
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 5 by 100. Nevada: 7 by 70.5. Florida International: 2 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. Oregon: 2 by 53.3. UCLA: 3 by 33.3. Northwestern: 2 by 16.7. Iowa: 3 by 42.2. Ohio State: 3 by 24.4. Indiana: 6 by 100. Michigan State: 4 by 63.3. Nebraska: 4 by 78.3. Rutgers: 4 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins54.5 · n=6 · +27 vs Losses
Losses27.5 · n=6 · -27 vs Wins
First Half43.1 · n=7 · +1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half41.7 · n=6 · -1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards | W 22-10 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 73 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Rutgers | W 40-36 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs Nebraska | W 37-10 | — | 4 | 47 | 9.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Michigan State | W 28-10 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Indiana | L 24-27 | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Ohio State | L 14-38 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Iowa | L 24-25 | — | 3 | 19 | 7 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Northwestern | L 21-22 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ UCLA | L 37-42 | — | 3 | 15 | 1.3 | 5 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Oregon | L 24-30 | — | 2 | 16 | 7.6 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 60 | 11.6 | 15 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Florida International | W 34-0 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Nevada | W 46-11 | — | 7 | 74 | 10.9 | 10.60 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Syracuse
2020-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Penn State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202020212022202220232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Syracuse | -1 | 0 | 7.1 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Syracuse | 69 | 73.4 | 6.3 | 70 |
| 2022 Postseason | Syracuse | 203 | 57.9 | 13.1 | 134 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Syracuse | 203 | 57.9 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Syracuse | 0 | — | — | -203 |
| 2024 Postseason | Syracuse | 941 | 71.3 | 22.1 | 941 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Syracuse | 941 | 71.3 | 22.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Penn State | 552 | 64.8 | 22.9 | -389 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Penn State | 552 | 64.8 | 22.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
128
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Clemson
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Wake Forest
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
UConn
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Syracuse
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Postseason · Syracuse
67.4
941 primary · 71.3 efficiency · 22.1 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Syracuse
67.4
941 primary · 71.3 efficiency · 22.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8426
Ocean Township · Oakhurst, NJ
- Committed To
- Syracuse
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,764
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 52 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.