Usage Score
22.9
Player Dossier
2020-2025Penn State
WR • 5'10" • 186 lbs • Ocean Township, NJ, USA
Trebor Pena reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
22.9
Efficiency
64.8
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
50.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Syracuse
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trebor Pena, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Syracuse. Trebor Pena reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Trebor Pena played WR for Syracuse and Penn State. Across 6 tracked seasons, Trebor Pena recorded 166 rushing yards, 1,764 receiving yards, and 15 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Syracuse.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Syracuse paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Syracuse, Penn State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
42.5
Efficiency
64.8
Usage
22.9
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 100. Nevada: 74. Florida International: 32. Unknown: 60. Oregon: 16. UCLA: 15. Northwestern: 5. Iowa: 19. Ohio State: 11. Indiana: 99. Michigan State: 38. Nebraska: 47. Rutgers: 36
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 5 by 100. Nevada: 7 by 70.5. Florida International: 2 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 100. Oregon: 2 by 53.3. UCLA: 3 by 33.3. Northwestern: 2 by 16.7. Iowa: 3 by 42.2. Ohio State: 3 by 24.4. Indiana: 6 by 100. Michigan State: 4 by 63.3. Nebraska: 4 by 78.3. Rutgers: 4 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ Clemson100 receiving yards | W 22-10 | — | 5 | 100 | 20 | 20 | 1 | 73 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Rutgers | W 40-36 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/23 | vs Nebraska | W 37-10 | — | 4 | 47 | 9.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Michigan State | W 28-10 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Indiana | L 24-27 | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Ohio State | L 14-38 | — | 3 | 11 | 3.7 | 3.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Iowa | L 24-25 | — | 3 | 19 | 7 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Northwestern | L 21-22 | — | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ UCLA | L 37-42 | — | 3 | 15 | 1.3 | 5 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Oregon | L 24-30 | — | 2 | 16 | 7.6 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 60 | 11.6 | 15 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Florida International | W 34-0 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Nevada | W 46-11 | — | 7 | 74 | 10.9 | 10.60 | 0 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Syracuse
2020-2024
Opening stop
Penn State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Syracuse | -1 | 0 | 7.1 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Syracuse | 69 | 73.4 | 6.3 | 70 |
| 2022 Postseason | Syracuse | 203 | 57.9 | 13.1 | 134 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Syracuse | 203 | 57.9 | 13.1 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Syracuse | 0 | — | — | -203 |
| 2024 Postseason | Syracuse | 941 | 71.3 | 22.1 | 941 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Syracuse | 941 | 71.3 | 22.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Penn State | 552 | 64.8 | 22.9 | -389 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Penn State | 552 | 64.8 | 22.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Primary metric
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Miami
128
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Clemson
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Wake Forest
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#5
UConn
43
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Syracuse
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Postseason · Syracuse
67.4
941 primary · 71.3 efficiency · 22.1 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Syracuse
67.4
941 primary · 71.3 efficiency · 22.1 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8426
Ocean Township · Oakhurst, NJ
Career Facts
2
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,764
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 52 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.