Usage Score
21.4
Player Dossier
2017-2020Buffalo
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • Breaux Bridge, LA, USA
Daniel Lee reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.4
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
61.7
Season Value
64.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daniel Lee, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2019 Postseason · Buffalo. Daniel Lee reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Daniel Lee played WR for Buffalo. Across 4 tracked seasons, Daniel Lee recorded 284 receiving yards and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2019 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2019 Postseason
Buffalo paired 284 primary output with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2020 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
31.6
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
21.4
Consistency
61.7
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Charlotte: 6. Penn State: 11. Liberty: 16. Akron: 30. Central Michigan: 14. Eastern Michigan: 67. Kent State: 58. Toledo: 47. Bowling Green: 35
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Charlotte: 1 by 40. Penn State: 1 by 73.3. Liberty: 1 by 100. Akron: 6 by 33.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 46.7. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Kent State: 4 by 96.7. Toledo: 3 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/20 | @ Charlotte | W 31-9 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 11/29 | vs Bowling Green | W 49-7 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Thu 11/21 | vs Toledo | W 49-30 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 25 |
| Fri 11/15 | @ Kent State | L 27-30 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 43-14 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Central Michigan | W 43-20 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Akron | W 21-0 | — | 6 | 30 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Liberty | L 17-35 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Penn State | L 13-45 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2017-2020
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2018 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2019 Postseason | Buffalo | 284 | 76.7 | 21.4 | 284 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Buffalo | 284 | 76.7 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | -284 |
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58
Primary metric
58 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
67
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Liberty
16
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
16 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2019 Postseason · Buffalo
284 primary output · 76.7 efficiency · 21.4 usage
64.9
#2
2019 Regular Season · Buffalo
64.9
284 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 21.4 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
284
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.