Usage Score
30.7
Player Dossier
2019-2024South Florida
WR • 5'10" • 186 lbs • Viera, FL, USA
Sean Atkins reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
30.7
Efficiency
62.5
Consistency
63.4
Season Value
58.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2023 Postseason · South Florida
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sean Atkins, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2023 Postseason · South Florida. Sean Atkins reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Sean Atkins played WR for South Florida. Across 6 tracked seasons, Sean Atkins recorded 161 passing yards, 75 rushing yards, and 2,185 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2023 with South Florida.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
South Florida paired 1,054 primary output with 70.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 62.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
61.5
Efficiency
62.5
Usage
30.7
Consistency
63.4
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San José State: 104. Bethune-Cookman: 42. Alabama: 35. Southern Miss: 87. Miami: 125. Tulane: 20. Memphis: 35. UAB: 14. Florida Atlantic: 57. Navy: 70. Charlotte: 32. Tulsa: 68. Rice: 110
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San José State: 11 by 63. Bethune-Cookman: 4 by 70. Alabama: 4 by 58.3. Southern Miss: 5 by 100. Miami: 11 by 75.8. Tulane: 3 by 44.4. Memphis: 5 by 46.7. UAB: 4 by 23.3. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 63.3. Navy: 7 by 66.7. Charlotte: 6 by 35.6. Tulsa: 7 by 64.8. Rice: 7 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/25 | @ San José State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-39 | — | 11 | 104 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ Rice100 receiving yards | L 28-35 | — | 7 | 110 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Tulsa | W 63-30 | — | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Charlotte | W 59-24 | — | 6 | 32 | 6.6 | 5.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Navy | L 7-28 | — | 7 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 22 |
| Fri 11/1 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 44-21 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs UAB | W 35-25 | — | 4 | 14 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Memphis | L 3-21 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Tulane | L 10-45 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Miami100 receiving yards · High volume | L 15-50 | — | 11 | 125 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Southern Miss | W 49-24 | — | 5 | 87 | 17.4 | 17.40 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ Alabama | L 16-42 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Bethune-Cookman | W 48-3 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
South Florida
2019-2024
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | South Florida | 1 | 6.7 | 6.3 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | South Florida | 26 | 50 | 8.4 | 25 |
| 2021 Regular Season | South Florida | 67 | 67.5 | 9.3 | 41 |
| 2022 Regular Season | South Florida | 238 | 67.2 | 16.2 | 171 |
| 2023 Postseason | South Florida | 1,054 | 70.5 | 33 | 816 |
| 2023 Regular Season | South Florida | 1,054 | 70.5 | 33 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | South Florida | 799 | 62.5 | 30.7 | -255 |
| 2024 Regular Season | South Florida | 799 | 62.5 | 30.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
169
Primary metric
169 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulsa
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 85.2 efficiency score.
#3
Miami
125
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 75.8 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
110
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Florida
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2023 Postseason · South Florida
1,054 primary output · 70.5 efficiency · 33 usage
68.5
#2
2023 Regular Season · South Florida
68.5
1,054 primary · 70.5 efficiency · 33 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · South Florida
58.1
799 primary · 62.5 efficiency · 30.7 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,185
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.