Usage Score
6.2
Player Dossier
2018-2022UTSA
LB • 6'3" • 225 lbs • Dickinson, TX, USA
Trevor Harmanson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.1 disruption score.
Usage Score
6.2
Efficiency
25.1
Consistency
54
Season Value
31.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · UTSA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Trevor Harmanson, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Postseason · UTSA. Trevor Harmanson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.1 disruption score.
Trevor Harmanson played LB for UTSA. Across 5 tracked seasons, Trevor Harmanson recorded 235 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2020 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Postseason
UTSA paired 21 primary output with 42.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2022 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.7
Efficiency
25.1
Usage
6.2
Consistency
54
Best Game by takeover score
Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 0. Houston: 1. Army: 1. Texas: 2. Texas Southern: 1. Middle Tennessee: 0.5. Western Kentucky: 0. Florida International: 1. North Texas: 1. UAB: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Rice: 1. UTEP: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 6 by 25. Houston: 9 by 47.5. Army: 8 by 43.3. Texas: 4 by 36.7. Texas Southern: 3 by 22.5. Middle Tennessee: 7 by 34.2. Western Kentucky: 5 by 20.8. Florida International: 2 by 18.3. North Texas: 2 by 18.3. UAB: 2 by 8.3. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 8.3. Rice: 5 by 30.8. UTEP: 3 by 12.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/16 | @ Troy | L 12-18 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 34-31 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | W 41-7 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 51-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | @ UAB | W 44-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas | W 31-27 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida International | W 30-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Western Kentucky | W 31-28 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/30 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 45-30 | 7 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Texas Southern | W 52-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/18 | @ TexasSplash game | L 20-41 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Army | W 41-38 | 8 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Houston | L 35-37 | 9 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2018-2022
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 Regular Season | UTSA | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2019 Regular Season | UTSA | 9.5 | 26.8 | 6.4 | 9.5 |
| 2020 Postseason | UTSA | 21 | 42.8 | 9.7 | 11.5 |
| 2020 Regular Season | UTSA | 21 | 42.8 | 9.7 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTSA | 5.5 | 22.2 | 4.7 | -15.5 |
| 2022 Postseason | UTSA | 8.5 | 25.1 | 6.2 | 3 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTSA | 8.5 | 25.1 | 6.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Stephen F. Austin
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 62.4 takeover score.
#2
UTEP
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.5 takeover score.
#3
Texas
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.
#4
North Texas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#5
Rice
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.8 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2020 Postseason · UTSA
21 primary output · 42.8 efficiency · 9.7 usage
53.9
#2
2020 Regular Season · UTSA
53.9
21 primary · 42.8 efficiency · 9.7 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · UTSA
33.3
9.5 primary · 26.8 efficiency · 6.4 usage
1
Impact games
10
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
235
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.