Usage Score
14.6
Player Dossier
2019-2023USC
RB • 5'10" • 200 lbs • Antioch, CA, USA
Austin Jones leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.5 efficiency.
Usage Score
14.6
Efficiency
58.5
Consistency
51.9
Season Value
46.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2020 Regular Season · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Jones, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2020 Regular Season · Stanford. Austin Jones leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.5 efficiency.
Austin Jones played RB for Stanford and USC. Across 5 tracked seasons, Austin Jones recorded 2,324 rushing yards, 890 receiving yards, and 2 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2022 with USC.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2020 Regular Season
Stanford paired 688 primary output with 44.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Stanford, USC.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Loss with 127 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
44.6
Efficiency
58.5
Usage
14.6
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 84. Nevada: 19. San José State: 54. Stanford: 47. Arizona State: 36. Colorado: 30. Arizona: 31. Notre Dame: 27. Utah: 31. California: 51. Washington: 127. Oregon: 34. UCLA: 9
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 15 by 57.4. Nevada: 2 by 89.6. San José State: 6 by 87.5. Stanford: 8 by 58.9. Arizona State: 3 by 100. Colorado: 4 by 43.8. Arizona: 7 by 37.2. Notre Dame: 11 by 25.6. Utah: 5 by 64.6. California: 11 by 45. Washington: 11 by 98.1. Oregon: 8 by 40.9. UCLA: 7 by 11.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Louisville | W 42-28 | 11 | 60 | 5.50 | 0 | 4 | 24 | 5.6 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs UCLA | L 20-38 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1.3 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Oregon | L 27-36 | 7 | 26 | 3.70 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4.3 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Washington100 rush yards | L 42-52 | 11 | 127 | 11.50 | 0 | — | — | 11.5 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ California2+ TD | W 50-49 | 9 | 37 | 4.10 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 4.6 |
| Sun 10/22 | vs Utah | L 32-34 | 5 | 31 | 6.20 | 0 | — | — | 6.2 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Notre Dame | L 20-48 | 11 | 27 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Arizona | W 43-41 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Colorado | W 48-41 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7.5 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Arizona State | W 42-28 | 3 | 36 | 12 | 0 | — | — | 12 |
| Sun 9/10 | vs Stanford | W 56-10 | 6 | 33 | 5.50 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 5.9 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Nevada | W 66-14 | 2 | 19 | 9.50 | 0 | — | — | 9.5 |
| Sun 8/27 | vs San José State2+ TD | W 56-28 | 6 | 54 | 9 | 2 | — | — | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2019-2021
Opening stop
USC
2022-2023
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Stanford | 335 | 45.1 | 9.8 | — |
| 2020 Regular Season | Stanford | 688 | 44.8 | 42.7 | 353 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Stanford | 645 | 41.1 | 26.5 | -43 |
| 2022 Postseason | USC | 966 | 56.5 | 20.3 | 321 |
| 2022 Regular Season | USC | 966 | 56.5 | 20.3 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | USC | 580 | 58.5 | 14.6 | -386 |
| 2023 Regular Season | USC | 580 | 58.5 | 14.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Washington
Loss with 127 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
127
Primary metric
127 scrimmage yards and 20.4 usage.
#2
Notre Dame
170
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
170 scrimmage yards and 45.6 usage.
#3
Washington
166
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
166 scrimmage yards and 56.7 usage.
#4
Vanderbilt
89
Primary metric
Win with 89 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
89 scrimmage yards and 17 usage.
#5
UCF
69
Primary metric
Loss with 69 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
69 scrimmage yards and 17 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2020 Regular Season · Stanford
688 primary output · 44.8 efficiency · 42.7 usage
59.2
#2
2022 Postseason · USC
59.2
966 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 20.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · USC
59.2
966 primary · 56.5 efficiency · 20.3 usage
7
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2019 · Rating 0.9471
Bishop O'Dowd · Oakland, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,214
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 55 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.