Usage Score
28
Player Dossier
2019-2023Georgia Southern
WR • 5'10" • 180 lbs • Mcdonough, GA, USA
Khaleb Hood reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28
Efficiency
61.3
Consistency
74.8
Season Value
66
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Khaleb Hood, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern. Khaleb Hood reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Khaleb Hood played WR for Georgia Southern. Across 5 tracked seasons, Khaleb Hood recorded 166 rushing yards, 2,683 receiving yards, and 4 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2023 with Georgia Southern.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Postseason
Georgia Southern paired 948 primary output with 61.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 61.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2023 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Coastal Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
72.9
Efficiency
61.3
Usage
28
Consistency
74.8
Best Game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 31. The Citadel: 45. UAB: 70. Wisconsin: 61. Ball State: 107. Coastal Carolina: 131. James Madison: 78. UL Monroe: 98. Georgia State: 91. Texas State: 67. Marshall: 46. Old Dominion: 28. App State: 95
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 7 by 29.5. The Citadel: 5 by 60. UAB: 8 by 58.3. Wisconsin: 7 by 58.1. Ball State: 7 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 12 by 72.8. James Madison: 10 by 52. UL Monroe: 8 by 81.7. Georgia State: 9 by 67.4. Texas State: 7 by 63.8. Marshall: 7 by 43.8. Old Dominion: 4 by 46.7. App State: 10 by 63.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Coastal Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ball State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/16 | @ Ohio | L 21-41 | — | 7 | 31 | 4.4 | 4.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ App StateHigh volume | L 27-55 | — | 10 | 95 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Old Dominion | L 17-20 | — | 4 | 28 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/12 | @ Marshall | L 33-38 | — | 7 | 46 | 6.6 | 6.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Texas State | L 24-45 | — | 7 | 67 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 38 |
| Thu 10/26 | vs Georgia StateHigh volume | W 44-27 | — | 9 | 91 | 10.1 | 10.10 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs UL MonroeHigh volume | W 38-28 | — | 8 | 98 | 11.4 | 12.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ James MadisonHigh volume | L 13-41 | — | 10 | 78 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Coastal Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-28 | — | 12 | 131 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards | W 40-3 | — | 7 | 107 | 15.4 | 15.30 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Wisconsin | L 14-35 | — | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs UABHigh volume | W 49-35 | — | 8 | 70 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs The Citadel | W 34-0 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 24 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Georgia Southern
2019-2023
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 95 | 63.3 | 20.4 | — |
| 2020 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 224 | 64 | 21.4 | 129 |
| 2020 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 224 | 64 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2021 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 497 | 77.3 | 32.6 | 273 |
| 2022 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 919 | 71 | 23.2 | 422 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 919 | 71 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Georgia Southern | 948 | 61.3 | 28 | 29 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Georgia Southern | 948 | 61.3 | 28 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
James Madison
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
39
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Coastal Carolina
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 72.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2023 Postseason · Georgia Southern
948 primary output · 61.3 efficiency · 28 usage
66
#2
2023 Regular Season · Georgia Southern
66
948 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 28 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Georgia Southern
65.6
919 primary · 71 efficiency · 23.2 usage
5
100+ receiving yards
9
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,683
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 59 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.