Player Stats

Chris Hilton Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
769
Receptions
40
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2021 PostseasonLSU2181141.2
2021 Regular SeasonLSU210041.2
2022 Regular SeasonLSU2698065.4
2023 PostseasonLSU7356164.1
2023 Regular SeasonLSU710169164.1
2024 PostseasonLSU44113170.4
2024 Regular SeasonLSU45130270.4
2025 PostseasonLSU9367041.6
2025 Regular SeasonLSU9755041.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason

LSU paired 243 primary output with 90 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 57.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Houston

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · LSU

Games

9

Receiving Yards / G

13.6

Efficiency

57.6

Usage

6.8

Consistency

35.7

Best Game by takeover score

Houston

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Houston: 67. Clemson: 1. Florida: 0. SE Louisiana: 19. Ole Miss: 10. South Carolina: 0. Texas A&M: 10. Alabama: 11. Oklahoma: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 3 by 100. Clemson: 1 by 6.7. SE Louisiana: 2 by 63.3. Ole Miss: 1 by 66.7. Texas A&M: 1 by 66.7. Alabama: 1 by 73.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins5 · Games = 4 · -15.4 vs Losses
Losses20.4 · Games = 5 · +15.4 vs Wins