Usage Score
6.8
Player Dossier
2021-2025LSU
Chris Hilton Jr.
WR • 6'0" • 190 lbs • Zachary, LA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Chris Hilton Jr. reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
57.6
Consistency
35.7
Season Value
42.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · LSU
212122232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Hilton Jr., WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · LSU. Chris Hilton Jr. reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Chris Hilton Jr. played WR for LSU. Across 5 tracked seasons, Chris Hilton Jr. recorded 769 receiving yards, 3 tackles, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2023 with LSU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
LSU paired 243 primary output with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 57.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · LSU
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
13.6
Efficiency
57.6
Usage
6.8
Consistency
35.7
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 67. Clemson: 1. Florida: 0. Unknown: 19. Ole Miss: 10. South Carolina: 0. Texas A&M: 10. Alabama: 11. Oklahoma: 4
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 3 by 100. Clemson: 1 by 6.7. Unknown: 2 by 63.3. Ole Miss: 1 by 66.7. Texas A&M: 1 by 66.7. Alabama: 1 by 73.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 26.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.3 · Games = 3 · -20.1 vs Losses
Losses20.4 · Games = 5 · +20.1 vs Wins
First Half19.4 · Games = 5 · +13.1 vs Second Half
Second Half6.3 · Games = 4 · -13.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
100 vs Houston
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/28 | @ Houston | L 35-38 | — | 3 | 67 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Oklahoma | L 13-17 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Alabama | L 9-20 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Texas A&M | L 25-49 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs South Carolina | W 20-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Ole Miss | L 19-24 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Florida | W 20-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Clemson | W 17-10 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
LSU
2021-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202120212022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | LSU | 81 | 50 | 9.4 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | LSU | 81 | 50 | 9.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | LSU | 98 | 81.4 | 12.4 | 17 |
| 2023 Postseason | LSU | 225 | 80.5 | 8.2 | 127 |
| 2023 Regular Season | LSU | 225 | 80.5 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | LSU | 243 | 90 | 9.3 | 18 |
| 2024 Regular Season | LSU | 243 | 90 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | LSU | 122 | 57.6 | 6.8 | -121 |
| 2025 Regular Season | LSU | 122 | 57.6 | 6.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Houston
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67
Primary metric
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Baylor
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kansas State
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Wisconsin
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
51
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · LSU
243 primary output · 90 efficiency · 9.3 usage
65
#2
2024 Regular Season · LSU
65
243 primary · 90 efficiency · 9.3 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · LSU
62.4
98 primary · 81.4 efficiency · 12.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.9646
Zachary · Zachary, LA
- Committed To
- LSU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
769
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 24 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.